73 mm vs. 83 mm BB and the Socom is lighter by nearly a pound. :thumbsup:
And by EVO lab you mean axed.EF76 said:im sure now that the 951 is complete, the Soc will get is turn in the EVO lab.... its due for a freshenin... I wanna see it get even lighter. like a 7.5" Spider. Make the Soc the super-flyweight in the lineup.
That's a big negative if it is a socom.Stalk said:Let's put it in that way: if Socom get axed, my frame will suddenly cost more on the market![]()
Trusting claimed weights is soooo ...... noob!gravityfreaky said:You are incorrect. This straight from the Intense website:
951
Weight 9.5lbs
Travel 8-8.5
Socom
Weight 9.6 lbs
Travel 8
I would rather see it at 8". If you only want 7.5" you just can build an Uzzi VP as a downhill bike.EF76 said:im sure now that the 951 is complete, the Soc will get is turn in the EVO lab.... its due for a freshenin... I wanna see it get even lighter. like a 7.5" Spider. Make the Soc the super-flyweight in the lineup.
Or it would be worth less because the remaining inventory will be sold on chainlove for 999 $.Stalk said:Let's put it in that way: if Socom get axed, my frame will suddenly cost more on the market![]()
Id like to know too.dhbikerczar said:I would consider the deraileur part of the DRS, so I guess to me most specific, does anybody know if one can put a chain guide, dual rings, and a deraileur on this frame? I think on the SoCom you had to grind down the normal Shimano deraileurs to get them to fit on the frame, but one could get it to work. I would be a bit surprised that if these are really being sold that someone hasn't tried this already.
I'm scratching my head wondering why anyone would want one on a 951kntr said:Will the 951 take a front derailer?