the typical single wheel tensioner can't handle a triple. Even a double is questionable.
Exactly.Sparticus said:Personally I despise front derailleurs. (Sorry Sheldon {RIP} but that's how I choose to spell it.) They don't shift as well as rear derailleurs, require a longer chain, encourage chain suck and still require a rear derailleur style tensioner due to chain take-up.
Might as well use a rear derailleur.
If I wanted a multi-speed bicycle, but only wanted gears at one end of the chain instead of both, it'd be at the back end. And that's exactly the way it is on several of my bikes... all the ones that aren't singlespeeds.
--Sparty
luvanicejump said:Anyone ever tried running just the front 3 speed derailer (http://www.sheldonbrown.com/derailer.html)
with a chain tensioner and single cog in back?
Are those chain tensioners able to pick up enough slack for this?
Looking for options.
Converting my 26" GT Backwoods to a single speed and the
though crossed my mind about keeping the front derailer.
I know this would disqualify it as a single speed...(insert wise comment here).![]()
i'm a fan of flipping the wheel and riding fixed on the ice and snow...luvanicejump said:yeah, it was a fleeting thought.
This is going to be a winter, studded tire bike.
I'll stick with old faithful single speed. I'll just gear it down a little.
I'm also looking at the White Industries ENO rear hub.
Anyone tried these out yet?
Not so fleeting.luvanicejump said:yeah, it was a fleeting thought.