Joined
·
3,533 Posts
I noted something interesting on the trail last night. Yes, I do ride occasionally, simmer down H-men. Anyway, I noted another rider, on a Fisher 29er HT, and not being able to tell which model it was, I struck up a friendly conversation.
Basically, I was like "hey, that's a good looking 29er, what is that, a X-cal??"...
He was like "I don't know, I just bought it a few weeks ago and I just ride it".
He apparently didn't know what model it was, he didn't know it was a 29er, he didn't know what a 29er is...but he was getting his ride-on. Disturbingly, he also didn't see how cool my fork was at the trailhead. I had a miserable ride on it with it's poor quality and didn't even get the "rad-dude respect" I was looking for....dammit!!
So the reason that I posit that this is a sign of the times, is that when the average-Joe consumer starts to not even distinguish or realize if they're buying a 29er or not, ie they're just buying a good mountain bike, then that is a significant marker in the steady and apparently unstoppable march of the 29er into the mainstream.
The guy said he had changed his diet, been riding nearly every night, was loving life and had already lost 20 pounds. We agreed to meet again tonight at 630 for another ride. This guy can be a good influence on me...
I was also not certain which exact Fish HT he was riding. It was burnt-orange colored, with a White REBA, bonty parts. Bone stock.
I just checked fisherbikes.com and it looks like it is probably the 2006 X-cal, but I note that on the fishy-site, it shows a silver REBA, whereas this guy had a WHITE REBA. Also, he had octagonal-shaped rotors, whereas the Fish-site shows a round rotor. Anyway, I am assuming it's a X-cal. I'll try to confirm tonight.
Here's the pic from Fish-site:
Basically, I was like "hey, that's a good looking 29er, what is that, a X-cal??"...
He was like "I don't know, I just bought it a few weeks ago and I just ride it".
He apparently didn't know what model it was, he didn't know it was a 29er, he didn't know what a 29er is...but he was getting his ride-on. Disturbingly, he also didn't see how cool my fork was at the trailhead. I had a miserable ride on it with it's poor quality and didn't even get the "rad-dude respect" I was looking for....dammit!!
So the reason that I posit that this is a sign of the times, is that when the average-Joe consumer starts to not even distinguish or realize if they're buying a 29er or not, ie they're just buying a good mountain bike, then that is a significant marker in the steady and apparently unstoppable march of the 29er into the mainstream.
The guy said he had changed his diet, been riding nearly every night, was loving life and had already lost 20 pounds. We agreed to meet again tonight at 630 for another ride. This guy can be a good influence on me...
I was also not certain which exact Fish HT he was riding. It was burnt-orange colored, with a White REBA, bonty parts. Bone stock.
I just checked fisherbikes.com and it looks like it is probably the 2006 X-cal, but I note that on the fishy-site, it shows a silver REBA, whereas this guy had a WHITE REBA. Also, he had octagonal-shaped rotors, whereas the Fish-site shows a round rotor. Anyway, I am assuming it's a X-cal. I'll try to confirm tonight.
Here's the pic from Fish-site:
