installed on or off of your 29er?vizsladog said:
Shimano slx m660 crank weight
Anyone weigh a set without the bb and rings??
These are suppose dto be real close in weight to xt and have a steel granny.
I run 1x9 so it wouldnt matter
These are suppose dto be real close in weight to xt and have a steel granny.
I run 1x9 so it wouldnt matter
1 - 17 of 17 Posts
My granny is so tough it's as if she's made of steel. I swear she could kick Chuck Norris's ass one handed while making pumpkin scones.
What was the question again?
What was the question again?
Wasn't sure since you are in the 29er forum and asking a drivetrain question. You aren't the only one, but I singled you out. How you like me now? This board has chapters for a reason. Use them.vizsladog said:off???
I did azzhat.
I posted in drivetrain no responce.....shimano no responce.
Like you now?? typical douchebag......
I posted in drivetrain no responce.....shimano no responce.
Like you now?? typical douchebag......
I like you Ed. That IS you in your avatar picture, right?BIGfatED said:... How you like me now?...
nope....and dont have the cranks yet either.....
Well since most people don't use them without chainrings and a BB, most people just don't care what they weigh without all that!!!. It is a weird question. Kinda like asking "how much does the steerer tube weigh on my fork".
I just installed a 170 mm set on my sons bike and weighted both arms and the bb at the bike shop. According to their scale the aggregate weight of all the parts was 880-890 grams.
CDIDriver
CDIDriver
No, it's not really like that at all.23mjm said:Well since most people don't use them without chainrings and a BB, most people just don't care what they weigh without all that!!!. It is a weird question. Kinda like asking "how much does the steerer tube weigh on my fork".
. I ride a 1x9....
The xtr cranks without bb/rings are only 60grams lighter than xt.
so if slx is only 10-20 grams heavier than xt it'd be a tough choice seeing how shimano claims slx is 100% stronger than xt...
xt 175
http://www.sicklines.com/gallery/showphoto.php/photo/5729
xtr 175
http://forums.mtbr.com/showthread.php?t=484256&highlight=xtr+m970
The xtr cranks without bb/rings are only 60grams lighter than xt.
so if slx is only 10-20 grams heavier than xt it'd be a tough choice seeing how shimano claims slx is 100% stronger than xt...
xt 175
http://www.sicklines.com/gallery/showphoto.php/photo/5729
xtr 175
http://forums.mtbr.com/showthread.php?t=484256&highlight=xtr+m970
613 gramsvizsladog said:Anyone weigh a set without the bb and rings??
These are suppose dto be real close in weight to xt and have a steel granny.
I run 1x9 so it wouldnt matter
My 3 rings weight was 180g.
Bottom Bracket 89g.
Set 883g.
thx
yours are the 3 ring???
yours are the 3 ring???
I also saw that claim about the SLX being a 100% stronger than XT but I think that refers to the SLX 665 two ring cranks with bash guard. They also for instance have steel inserts for the pedals to thread into.vizsladog said:so if slx is only 10-20 grams heavier than xt it'd be a tough choice seeing how shimano claims slx is 100% stronger than xt...
Ronnie.
Yep. The only difference in weight between the XT and the SLX is the granny ring. The SLX is steel while the XT is aluminum. I personally like the look of the SLX better then the XT,and I bought mine for $140.00.vizsladog said:thx
yours are the 3 ring???
1 - 17 of 17 Posts
Mountain Bike Reviews Forum
A forum community dedicated to Mountain Bike owners and enthusiasts. Come join the discussion about bike parts, components, deals, performance, modifications, classifieds, trails, troubleshooting, maintenance, and more!
Full Forum Listing
Explore Our Forums
Top Contributors this Month
View All
ilmfat
764 Replies
DIRTJUNKIE
443 Replies
Sparticus
416 Replies
Recommended Communities
