I'm assuming you're talking about the Juan Solo? I personally found that it was more like aluminum than steel. However, it did not have that aluminum vibration that I'm not fond of. It just felt stiff and wickedly fast. I mean real fast. You'd have to change your screen name here because it would no longer be accurate. It was just one of those frames that made you want to stand up and hammer just to feel the acceleration. If you're willing to give up a little compliance for that increased stiffness, I'd say go for it.SlowSSer said:just curious. what's it ride like? more like aluminum or steel or ti?
(im jonesin for a salsa and have the means to get one at a wicked discount)
either the juan solo or the (gasp-gearie content!!!) XT/LX bandito- same weight, roughly.gabe0807 said:I'm assuming you're talking about the Juan Solo? I personally found that it was more like aluminum than steel. However, it did not have that aluminum vibration that I'm not fond of. It just felt stiff and wickedly fast. I mean real fast. You'd have to change your screen name here because it would no longer be accurate. It was just one of those frames that made you want to stand up and hammer just to feel the acceleration. If you're willing to give up a little compliance for that increased stiffness, I'd say go for it.
thanks for the info- figured that you'd just give me [email protected] for possibly getting another bikeeSSq said:I saw one out on the trail a few weeks back. The guy riding it said he loved it; I didn't ask about the ride characteristics, though. Martini just got a Scandium JTS 'crosser, that he was raving about. Check for his post, maybe?
Yeah, I couldn't get out of the office on time. Last minute client problem... lawyering would be much easier without clients!SlowSSer said:dude- what happened to you joining us for friday fred last week? we all missed ya! heck, had to drink a extra saporo because you werent there.
well, there will be plenty more.eSSq said:Yeah, I couldn't get out of the office on time. Last minute client problem... lawyering would be much easier without clients!
It would have been a nice evening for a ride, and a beer or 3.
So what do you think about the carbon seatstays...? I'm shopping for a new road bike and note that a lot of folks are running carbon seatstays, even with steel frames (*gasp* even the LeMond Zurich).ssmike said:I've been logging miles on a scandium road bike w/ carbon s/s and have to say that it a fabulous riding material. I describe the ride as "quiet." The bike just disappears under you as you roll out the miles.
I like the carbon s/s - although I think a full scandium road frame would also be a killer awesome riding frame too. Carbon stays improve the ride quality of most aluminum frames.eSSq said:So what do you think about the carbon seatstays...? I'm shopping for a new road bike and note that a lot of folks are running carbon seatstays, even with steel frames (*gasp* even the LeMond Zurich).
I'm thinking about a lower end ti Litespeed (no carbon stays) but am willing to consider informed opinions...
thanks for the linky!ssmike said:here's what he has to say. http://forums.mtbr.com/showthread.php?t=32399 I'd say it's fairly glowing on the attributes of scandium. I've been logging miles on a scandium road bike w/ carbon s/s and have to say that it a fabulous riding material. I describe the ride as "quiet." The bike just disappears under you as you roll out the miles.
TT length is causing isues for myself as well- both 26ers are about 23.5 inches TT (center to center, of course) for a large titus (about 19") and a 19" dean. im wondering if the compromise of the 20" salsa would yield the right TT length (barely under 23"), but be too tall for the standover?dankilling said:I demo'd the Juan Solo at JTMBW- it was the kind of bike you could flick around- If I had the $$ I would buy one....it was more compliant than any alu bike I have ridden, but still stiff and light! The TT seemed a little short for me, though...(standover was correct)