Hi everyone!
Just registered to this forum.
Coming from XC to the enduro world and building up my first bike ever from scratch, after bike wrapping my SB150 I noticed a thing which has been dealt to some extent in connection with the SB100: the gap between the frame and the GripLock assembly. I haven't installed the fork yet, but even just by pushing the assembly onto the upper bearing it comes apparent that a couple of Nm torque on the stem cap screw will not solve the problem. Has any SB150 owner encountered the same issue? And maybe solved it already? I'm still waiting for info from Yeti. In some build up YouTube videos SB150s are speced with the same CK Dropset 1, and you can see that the upper bearing is not nearly flush with the frame. Seems that it's only an aesthetic issue not affecting the secur installation and functioning of the fork. If there are no safety relevant issues at hand, the looks could be improved just by putting an O-ring type seal on the outside where the gap is. Maybe a seal of 44mmx3mm would work. I do acknowledge that there shouldn't be a gap in the first place (maybe a small one so that the assembly can rotate freely without scratching the frame), but if you want to use CK stuff and there is only the visual thing... Still wondering that in times of standardisation CK praises that their head sets are made for Yeti & Co. Or is there a problem on the side of the frame manufacturer, i.e., the ream depth is insufficient. But in that case also other headsets would have the same issue, which doesn't seem to be the case.
Any ideas on this one?
Just registered to this forum.
Coming from XC to the enduro world and building up my first bike ever from scratch, after bike wrapping my SB150 I noticed a thing which has been dealt to some extent in connection with the SB100: the gap between the frame and the GripLock assembly. I haven't installed the fork yet, but even just by pushing the assembly onto the upper bearing it comes apparent that a couple of Nm torque on the stem cap screw will not solve the problem. Has any SB150 owner encountered the same issue? And maybe solved it already? I'm still waiting for info from Yeti. In some build up YouTube videos SB150s are speced with the same CK Dropset 1, and you can see that the upper bearing is not nearly flush with the frame. Seems that it's only an aesthetic issue not affecting the secur installation and functioning of the fork. If there are no safety relevant issues at hand, the looks could be improved just by putting an O-ring type seal on the outside where the gap is. Maybe a seal of 44mmx3mm would work. I do acknowledge that there shouldn't be a gap in the first place (maybe a small one so that the assembly can rotate freely without scratching the frame), but if you want to use CK stuff and there is only the visual thing... Still wondering that in times of standardisation CK praises that their head sets are made for Yeti & Co. Or is there a problem on the side of the frame manufacturer, i.e., the ream depth is insufficient. But in that case also other headsets would have the same issue, which doesn't seem to be the case.
Any ideas on this one?
Attachments
-
149.4 KB Views: 1,500