Joined
·
55 Posts
So I've been mountain biking since 2005 but I've always ridden XC style single track. Started getting into more enduro/DH stuff last year and with that came the natural progression from a HT to a new FS bike earlier this year. It came spec'd with a RS Revelation RC fork (which if you saw my other post has been promptly sent right back to SRAM for warranty service). And that's when I really started digging into fork technology and researching RS and Fox front suspension. And in doing so, it was obvious that it is generally agreed that MoCo is basically...well, garbage as most like to call it.
So my question is this: what is it about the Charger compression damping that makes it so much better/superior/plusher/whatever? By that, I don't necessarily mean the technology behind it….I get that part. More along the lines of what can I expect? Is the ride quality a noticeable and undeniably better experience and if so, at what ability level? I mean, does it take a 'great' rider to benefit from the Charger upgrade or will a 'good' rider or even an entry level rider notice/benefit from the difference? Or, are the differences so nuanced, that unless you are really pushing the limit of the fork (huge gaps/drops, big jumps, unforgiving rock gardens, etc) would it be considered almost a waste of money?
I called Push Ind and talked to them about just servicing the entire thing and while they were at it, add the Charger 2.1 w/ the HC97 upgrade. But the $700 price tag for that had me hit the brakes. Plus I just decided to ride the bike with the proper functioning MoCo for a season before possibly upgrading over the winter. That way I can see and feel for myself the true difference in ride quality.
Just looking for some real-world feedback to make more of an informed decision before I pull the trigger over the winter and invest the $$ in it.
Thanks in advance for any comments and input.
So my question is this: what is it about the Charger compression damping that makes it so much better/superior/plusher/whatever? By that, I don't necessarily mean the technology behind it….I get that part. More along the lines of what can I expect? Is the ride quality a noticeable and undeniably better experience and if so, at what ability level? I mean, does it take a 'great' rider to benefit from the Charger upgrade or will a 'good' rider or even an entry level rider notice/benefit from the difference? Or, are the differences so nuanced, that unless you are really pushing the limit of the fork (huge gaps/drops, big jumps, unforgiving rock gardens, etc) would it be considered almost a waste of money?
I called Push Ind and talked to them about just servicing the entire thing and while they were at it, add the Charger 2.1 w/ the HC97 upgrade. But the $700 price tag for that had me hit the brakes. Plus I just decided to ride the bike with the proper functioning MoCo for a season before possibly upgrading over the winter. That way I can see and feel for myself the true difference in ride quality.
Just looking for some real-world feedback to make more of an informed decision before I pull the trigger over the winter and invest the $$ in it.
Thanks in advance for any comments and input.