Mountain Bike Reviews Forum banner

Ripley AF lower link o-ring replacement help

2074 Views 7 Replies 4 Participants Last post by  Garce41
2
Hey everybody. I posted this in the Ripley AF thread but figured any answers to a question would get lost in there. Here’s my issue that I’m looking for some input on please.

I have a new Ripley AF, second ride out I was going to wash it and noticed the o-ring on the lower link of the drive side must have been knocked out of the groove on assembly and was squeezed out by the link.I tried to loosen the link and reseat the o-ring but it was distorted when the link was torqued. I reached out to ibis and they sent new o-rings.

Here’s my question: I’ve watched the bashing replacement video on the ibis site and it’s helpful but I’m trying to take the bike apart as little as possible. I’m hoping that I can just remove the lower shock bolt and move the shock out of the way and then take one end of the upper link apart to free up the rear triangle. Then hopefully remove the lower link enough to replace the o-rings. Am I correct that the lower link slides out from the non drive side? Looks like the drive side is a clamp and the non drive has a shaft. I shouldn’t need to remove the cranks hopefully?
Also I would definitely take the bike back to the dealer that I bought it from but they are 4hrs away and also the closest ibis dealer and the shop where I live I don’t know them enough to want them to do the work. I’ve bought a few things from them since I just moved here but they are a trek dealer and don’t seem to do much mtn bike business. Thanks for any input you may have here’s a pic for reference.

Tire Automotive tire Hood Product Automotive lighting

Hood Automotive tire Automotive design Motor vehicle Automotive lighting
See less See more
1 - 8 of 8 Posts
Not an af, for me I have to remove the crank as I have a chainring guide on mine. You may not? Appears close in your picture. Releasing the air out of the shock gave me enough of an angle to torque the pinch bolt without removing the upper link for more articulation. I would regrease the pivots since you are there.
  • Like
Reactions: 1
Not an af, for me I have to remove the crank as I have a chainring guide on mine. You may not? Appears close in your picture. Releasing the air out of the shock gave me enough of an angle to torque the pinch bolt without removing the upper link for more articulation. I would regrease the pivots since you are there.
i will definitely re-grease everything with belray grease. I took it apart a little bit to try and get the old oring to seat but couldn’t and don’t think the upper link needs to be removed just worried about binding something up in the process. I’m used to working on dirtbikes so I get nervous around bicycles because everything seems so delicate. Thanks for the tip
The pivot axle on the front triangle has to be removed from the drive side completely to replace that O ring, which typically requires removing the cranks, but perhaps not if you have a small enough chain ring.
Do I need to remove the upper link or can I just pull the lower link apart with everything else (shock mount and upper link) still attached? I guess I’m just confused which order to start removing things or if it even matters. This is where a nice repair manual would come in handy
Upper link does not need to come off and you're better off leaving it on. I think you will need to detach the front shock mount at a minimum in order that you can get the lower pivot back together again. Wrap the front of the shock in a rag so that it doesn't mar the frame when you actuate the suspension to get the lower pivot back together.

edit: with an external reservoir shock it might be safer to completely remove the shock as the space could be a bit tight.
  • Like
Reactions: 2
Not sure what the outcome was, the dealer took the bike back and I traded for a Ripmo AF which has been an awesome bike so far. Sorry for no updates
1 - 8 of 8 Posts
This is an older thread, you may not receive a response, and could be reviving an old thread. Please consider creating a new thread.
Top