Joined
·
14,019 Posts
Re: Richard C replies.....
http://forums.mtbr.com/showthread.php?t=170773
I came across this thread from nearly 3 years ago when looking to check my facts.
Turns out I closed that thread myself, so I'll now open another
Since, Fisher have intruduced G2 geoemtry, which put an end to most of the ground for arguments regading toe overlap and handling, addressing them in one move.
I am now in the position where I don't defend 29" as much as I attack the to me odd religion felt for the in-between 650B wheel size.
We're not at around 60 different 29" tire molds, other 29"-specific parts have become to vast to keep count of. It's a big business, for this who beleived they could sell it.
I wonder, how does the cycling oracle view 29", and it's issies for riders under 5'6"? Although few XS bike are offered yet, I do like to profess that G2 has dropped the entry level for 29" by 4 inches, IMO to under 5'0".
While Europe hasn't moved an inch (650B?), let alone two and a half of them, in the rest o the world, 29" is becoming a top choice for people's next XC bike purchase.
One thing still has not changed. 29" riders are still pleading for wider rims and tires, and longer travel frames. Even though we've seen some developments in all three departments.
3 months from 29inch's 10th anniversary (arrivial of first WTB Nanoraptor 29x2.1" tires), how far have we come, and how much more is there to go?
Fad or revolution, new option or new deal?
Hit me!
http://forums.mtbr.com/showthread.php?t=170773
I came across this thread from nearly 3 years ago when looking to check my facts.
Turns out I closed that thread myself, so I'll now open another
Since, Fisher have intruduced G2 geoemtry, which put an end to most of the ground for arguments regading toe overlap and handling, addressing them in one move.
I am now in the position where I don't defend 29" as much as I attack the to me odd religion felt for the in-between 650B wheel size.
We're not at around 60 different 29" tire molds, other 29"-specific parts have become to vast to keep count of. It's a big business, for this who beleived they could sell it.
I wonder, how does the cycling oracle view 29", and it's issies for riders under 5'6"? Although few XS bike are offered yet, I do like to profess that G2 has dropped the entry level for 29" by 4 inches, IMO to under 5'0".
While Europe hasn't moved an inch (650B?), let alone two and a half of them, in the rest o the world, 29" is becoming a top choice for people's next XC bike purchase.
One thing still has not changed. 29" riders are still pleading for wider rims and tires, and longer travel frames. Even though we've seen some developments in all three departments.
3 months from 29inch's 10th anniversary (arrivial of first WTB Nanoraptor 29x2.1" tires), how far have we come, and how much more is there to go?
Fad or revolution, new option or new deal?
Hit me!