Many (most) 1x cranks employ a direct mount ring.
Right?
No such thing as a granny on a 1x crank.
=sParty
Right?
No such thing as a granny on a 1x crank.
=sParty
Yup.Many (most) 1x cranks employ a direct mount ring.
Right?
I suppose I could've pulled off my xt cranks from another bike and done a mock up but I just took the rep's word for it. Apparently, any kind of lock ring for spiderless cranks will interfere. I was hoping someone on here has had the same dilemma and potential advice for a workaround.Pictures would be good as others have done what you are trying to do:
Also as Sparty noted a direct mount ring will not have the mounting bolts for the granny. Race face makes the Aeffect. It's a 24 mm spindle - read shimano style BB with a direct mount ring.
Aeffect Crankset – Race Face
I know, I know ... I'm kind of an mtb Luddite but I keep up with relevant technology.Also as Sparty noted a direct mount ring will not have the mounting bolts for the granny. Race face makes the Aeffect. It's a 24 mm spindle - read shimano style BB with a direct mount ring.
Aeffect Crankset – Race Face
Indeed!Hmmm, I would think that since the lock-ring for a Shimano direct-mount is designed sit against the bearing on a Shimano bottom bracket, it would also be fine with the Philcentric?
Is it possible the Phil directions pre-date the Shimano direct-mount system?
If the ribs on the spider in the picture below would interfere, you could go with an aftermarket chainring - Wolftooth for example
![]()
![]()