Mountain Bike Reviews Forum banner

Opinions on my new chain tensioner design?

3969 Views 44 Replies 16 Participants Last post by  whayong
I just made up a prototype set of chain tensioners. They weigh in less than 9 grams a piece. They have a bottle opener built in, an idea which i kindly borrowed lol. The chain tensioners aren't side-specific, which means that on one side of the bike, the opener is on the bottom, and on the other side, it's on the top. This makes it convenient if you have your bike right-side up, or up-side down and are trying to open a bottle. They are aluminum, and i put a polished finish on the exposed surfaces. These are just prototypes mind you, so the finished ones will be much cleaner.
I'm just looking for some opinions on them... got any?:D
good or bad are appreciated.
PS: dont mind my beat up PUSS.

See less See more
2
1 - 20 of 45 Posts
Looks sharp (literally and figuratively). Not sure the market really needs another tensioner, but those are nice. Maybe do some bling ano colours...
i suppose i could put some radii on some of the sharp corners. Didnt think they'd be in a typical injury inducive area though.
Thanks!
That would be pretty cool.

"My bike isn't just a bike... it is also a bottle opener."
SSSasky said:
some bling ano colours...
Shove it with that crap....let the 90's die already :p
Gorgeous. I want one! (Seriously, what do I have to do?)

Looks pretty thick, getting enough threads into the QR nut?

And I guess on the non-drive side, you'd have to either turn the bike or the beer upside down....
I like, polished is nice, elegant design

will those also work with front facing horizontal drops?
j e SS e said:
Gorgeous. I want one! (Seriously, what do I have to do?)

Looks pretty thick, getting enough threads into the QR nut?

And I guess on the non-drive side, you'd have to either turn the bike or the beer upside down....
Thanks!
It is about .150" thick. I've made ones that were counterbored to be a little thinner in the past, and they've actually bent from tightening the QR. This i think is a happy medium. My QR nut fits just fine, although a QR for a tandem bike is reccomended for anything with chain tensioners, IMHO.
As for the opener thing, here's my reasoning:
if you lay your bike down or lean it against something, most of the time the drive side is up to prevent damage to the drivetrain (not super neccesary on a SS, but hey, most of us came from gear decent, and old habbits die hard). This way all you have to do is pull the bike upright to use the opener.
On the other hand, when you're wrenching on your bike or if you have a habbit of keeping your bike upsidedown, you can still open your beer on the non-drive side. I could put one on both sides of each tensioner like someone else does with their heavy steel ones, but i'm a minimalist, and the goal was to make them as light as possible, because frankly, i'd rather not have tensioners at all if i could avoid it without spending $$$$. Ok, fine, i'm a weight weinie!:D
This was one of the things i was hoping to get an opinion on. Would you guys rather see them both in the same direction?
And as for getting a set, i suppose i could run off a limited amount if some people were interested in trying them out. Figure maybe $15 a set for the first 10 sets so i can get some feedback?
These are fully CNC'd aluminum, hand polished, and stainless hardware will be included.
Manufactured in my home garage!
See less See more
doco said:
I like, polished is nice, elegant design

will those also work with front facing horizontal drops?
got a picture? if not, i'm sure i can whip some up that will work.
ISuckAtRiding said:
got a picture? if not, i'm sure i can whip some up that will work.
Are we talking about the semi horizontal drop like on the Cross Check?
J-No said:
Are we talking about the semi horizontal drop like on the Cross Check?
if so, these probably wont work, but i have some ideas.
ISuckAtRiding said:
...Figure maybe $15 a set for the first 10 sets so i can get some feedback?...
They look good to me. PM me if you want to sell a set.
Any experience with the screw wandering? Did you locktite it or once set does it tsya there?

I'd be interested in a set.

Cheers,
Marty
They look great!!

I already have some for my only track end frame. But boy if I saw this 2 days earlier you would have a customer.

But a bottle opener is unnecessary. SPD's work fine!
marty_hd said:
Any experience with the screw wandering? Did you locktite it or once set does it tsya there?

I'd be interested in a set.

Cheers,
Marty
that screw is just there for demonstration purposes. i'll be ordering some stainless steel replacements on monday, and jam nuts will be included. But i've been using a similar set on my bike that i made years ago without a jam nut, and they dont move very much if at all.

If anyone wants a set, shoot me a pm with your zip code and/or address and i'll shoot you a price shipped. My zip is 92027 if you want to check yourself, and i'll probably mail them via usps priority unless you want something different.
Dan
ISuckAtRiding said:
Thanks!
It is about .150" thick. I've made ones that were counterbored to be a little thinner in the past, and they've actually bent from tightening the QR. This i think is a happy medium. My QR nut fits just fine, although a QR for a tandem bike is reccomended for anything with chain tensioners, IMHO.
As for the opener thing, here's my reasoning:
if you lay your bike down or lean it against something, most of the time the drive side is up to prevent damage to the drivetrain (not super neccesary on a SS, but hey, most of us came from gear decent, and old habbits die hard). This way all you have to do is pull the bike upright to use the opener.
On the other hand, when you're wrenching on your bike or if you have a habbit of keeping your bike upsidedown, you can still open your beer on the non-drive side. I could put one on both sides of each tensioner like someone else does with their heavy steel ones, but i'm a minimalist, and the goal was to make them as light as possible, because frankly, i'd rather not have tensioners at all if i could avoid it without spending $$$$. Ok, fine, i'm a weight weinie!:D
This was one of the things i was hoping to get an opinion on. Would you guys rather see them both in the same direction?
And as for getting a set, i suppose i could run off a limited amount if some people were interested in trying them out. Figure maybe $15 a set for the first 10 sets so i can get some feedback?
These are fully CNC'd aluminum, hand polished, and stainless hardware will be included.
Manufactured in my home garage!
No I totally dig it as it is. Though I use the Surlys, I do find them bulky and heavy. And it's annoying having to use the little washer with a QR axle.

Every bit on my KM is polished (all my bikes, actually), so this is perfect.

Thanks for being. :thumbsup:
j e SS e said:
No I totally dig it as it is. Though I use the Surlys, I do find them bulky and heavy. And it's annoying having to use the little washer with a QR axle.

Every bit on my KM is polished (all my bikes, actually), so this is perfect.

Thanks for being. :thumbsup:
Cool, thanks man!
Glad to see my work is worthy of such a mythical creature as a Karate Monkey!

I also am hooked on polishing stuff. I don't know why, i guess I've always been attracted to shiny things.:D
hey guys, for whoever's interested, shipping is $4.95 american flat rate to anyone in the US, and $12.95 or international. This is shipped via USPS Priority, so it'll get to you quick, at least stateside. If anyone wants a different shipping method, let me know.
hardware will be here tomorrow, so i'm still on schedule for getting these out on Wed. for whoever ordered them :)
[QUOTE=j e SS e

Every bit on my KM is polished (all my bikes, actually), so this is perfect.

Stuff it with polished already. Let the 80s BMX days die.
1 - 20 of 45 Posts
This is an older thread, you may not receive a response, and could be reviving an old thread. Please consider creating a new thread.
Top