Joined
·
443 Posts
I've owned many Cannondales including three right now and all are fantastic.
Ryan - if you'd like to get a first-hand account of just how good "Crack'N'Fails" are, I would be happy to lend you one of mine for an 8x12 race this summer. I would put money on you improving your time
As for the carbon/Alu argument. I love carbon and I use it as much as possible, especially on my road bikes. But when it comes to mountain bikes, I would ONLY use it for racing. It's the same argument as using ALU bolts to lighten your bike. Sure they'll make your bike insanely light, but I also don't expect the same durability as steel. Same goes for carbon frames. Personally though, considering the Rush carbon is only 300 grams heavier than the rush aluminum, I'd rather make up that 300 grams in other more important places like wheels, tires, cranks etc.
LIGHT-STRONG-CHEAP
When it comes to bikes, pick two of the above! You can't have everything.
Dan
Ryan - if you'd like to get a first-hand account of just how good "Crack'N'Fails" are, I would be happy to lend you one of mine for an 8x12 race this summer. I would put money on you improving your time
As for the carbon/Alu argument. I love carbon and I use it as much as possible, especially on my road bikes. But when it comes to mountain bikes, I would ONLY use it for racing. It's the same argument as using ALU bolts to lighten your bike. Sure they'll make your bike insanely light, but I also don't expect the same durability as steel. Same goes for carbon frames. Personally though, considering the Rush carbon is only 300 grams heavier than the rush aluminum, I'd rather make up that 300 grams in other more important places like wheels, tires, cranks etc.
LIGHT-STRONG-CHEAP
When it comes to bikes, pick two of the above! You can't have everything.
Dan