How dare you make such a statement and then not attach a link!...LOL! I'll go look.
It's their new QR15 thru-axle design, but not too much info has been released yet.RSabarese said:Anybody notice a cool looking QR Axel in the Minute page? I wonder ...
That would be our axle design.boomn said:It's their new QtaperR thru-axle design, but not too much info has been released yet. Quoted from another thread:
"Our QtapeR axle not only cinches down on the hub axle like other designs, but also grabs the lowers using our conical wedge design".
Yeah, there's no way they can be a serious contender without a bigger than 32mm stanchioned AM fork. I'm betting it's been in the works and may even be close to release...unless everyone up there has been in a coma.mattsavage said:...Please, Manitou, 160mm forks!!!!
Sorry, getting my terms mixed up. Yours is very cool tooNoahColorado said:That would be our axle design.![]()
Yeah, it's missing some info from the old website. But shock sizes are pretty standard. The Revox starts at 8.75, Swingers at 6.5 to 8.75, Radium 6-7.5, Metal I'm not sure...keen said:Rear shocks do not list sizes available ???
Yep, butted aluminum stanchions, hollow forged crown, butted aluminum steerer, hollow axle. Mars or RT2.Vespasianus said:I wonder why they done bring back the SC Travis (34mm) as a 160-180mm fork? Skip the IT, which can be problematic, and make it a MARS fixed travel fork.
Question Nr.1... Why on earth did they retire the Nixon??Vespasianus said:I wonder why they done bring back the SC Travis (34mm) as a 160-180mm fork? Skip the IT, which can be problematic, and make it a MARS fixed travel fork.
Forget MARS, a 160-180mm fork needs a coil spring.Vespasianus said:I wonder why they done bring back the SC Travis (34mm) as a 160-180mm fork? Skip the IT, which can be problematic, and make it a MARS fixed travel fork.