Hi all,
This is my first post as a newbie to this forum and to "proper" mountain biking. (well, not "proper" in some eyes).
Background: Want a 27.5 inch hardtail of decent quality, but not too expensive.
Shortlist: Trek Roscoe 6 vs Norco Fluid HT 2/3
Prices: $1,300 (HT3) vs $1,500 (Rosoce) vs $1,700 (HT2)
I am not really interested at this stage as to which bike is "better". For my level and interest, they will both be amazing bikes, ample for my needs for the next 5 years.
My main question is regarding tyres:
(Happy to geek out about all the ins and outs and pros and cons of both these bikes separately, but for now, my main question is tyres)
Assuming most of the components are similar, and both great bikes, I think a big difference will be in the tyres.
Roscoe = 2.8 Kenda Havok
Fluid HT = 2.4 Maxxis Ardent
Does anyone have solid views on this? I have obviously read all the simplistic pros and cons, but still hard to gauge what better.
My current tyre on an entry level Giant is a "Giant" 27.5 x 2.1
Therefore, both tyres will be much better.
Question: Will the 2.4 be enough of a difference over my 2.1's or will the proper PLUS size tyre on the Trek make a huge difference?
Also: Kenda tyres on Roscoe don't get great reviews. Would the "better" Ardent make up for its narrower width?
I don't need to do huge speed and am not focused on XC, so I don't feel like the 2.8 will be too slow.
Any thoughts?
Thanks for anything anyone has to offer.
Shane
This is my first post as a newbie to this forum and to "proper" mountain biking. (well, not "proper" in some eyes).
Background: Want a 27.5 inch hardtail of decent quality, but not too expensive.
Shortlist: Trek Roscoe 6 vs Norco Fluid HT 2/3
Prices: $1,300 (HT3) vs $1,500 (Rosoce) vs $1,700 (HT2)
I am not really interested at this stage as to which bike is "better". For my level and interest, they will both be amazing bikes, ample for my needs for the next 5 years.
My main question is regarding tyres:
(Happy to geek out about all the ins and outs and pros and cons of both these bikes separately, but for now, my main question is tyres)
Assuming most of the components are similar, and both great bikes, I think a big difference will be in the tyres.
Roscoe = 2.8 Kenda Havok
Fluid HT = 2.4 Maxxis Ardent
Does anyone have solid views on this? I have obviously read all the simplistic pros and cons, but still hard to gauge what better.
My current tyre on an entry level Giant is a "Giant" 27.5 x 2.1
Therefore, both tyres will be much better.
Question: Will the 2.4 be enough of a difference over my 2.1's or will the proper PLUS size tyre on the Trek make a huge difference?
Also: Kenda tyres on Roscoe don't get great reviews. Would the "better" Ardent make up for its narrower width?
I don't need to do huge speed and am not focused on XC, so I don't feel like the 2.8 will be too slow.
Any thoughts?
Thanks for anything anyone has to offer.
Shane