Mountain Bike Reviews Forum banner
1 - 10 of 10 Posts

·
Registered
Joined
·
169 Posts
Discussion Starter · #3 ·
Gave 'em an email instead. Kinda funny, I got a response from the email before that live chat thing found someone to help me. They said to go with a 19".
 

·
Premium Member
Joined
·
48,238 Posts
Stregone said:
Gave 'em an email instead. Kinda funny, I got a response from the email before that live chat thing found someone to help me. They said to go with a 19".
Did they give you a top tube length?
 

·
Premium Member
Joined
·
48,238 Posts
Stregone said:
Damn they are quick. Its 22"
For the 19" frame? That is on the short end of the range. I am about your size and like 23-23.5" top tubes. Many riders think even that is too short.
 

·
Registered
Joined
·
2,822 Posts
dang, those are short TT lengths, brings me back to 1992!... did they say if that's center-center or effective?

Stregone said:
yup.

Heh, there is geometry info listed, but its under pictures
 

·
Premium Member
Joined
·
48,238 Posts
logbiter said:
dang, those are short TT lengths, brings me back to 1992!... did they say if that's center-center or effective?
They are short for 1992. My 20" 1991 Rocky Mountain has a 23.5" TT.

It is strange the "frame size" and "seat tube" are both "ctr. to top" and differ by ~2.75".
 
1 - 10 of 10 Posts
Top