Joined
·
13,085 Posts
Has anyone else noticed this? I love the precise handling of my HH 100x with four inches of travel but went with a TALAS so I could increase the travel a bit for nastier descents and steeper drops etc. After some experimentation with different travel settings while at Tahoe last week I settled on 95-98mm for climbing and 98-101mm for most descents. With rocky drops and steps ala Toads it seemed like longer travel settings (105-110) just made the front end move up and down more and be more likely to stall forward progress making the bike more endo prone. Is this normally the case or do I have some set up issues to work through? More or less rebound etc.
If it is, then in theory the best bike for slow, technical, rocky moves would be a fully rigid bike ala Alex at Spring Fling, right? You know exactly where the front wheel is and the steering is very precise. Or do I just have to adapt my riding style for the longer suspension?
I do like the the more stable feel of longer travel on fast, kinda rough descents, but if it's very curvy at all I still prefer the sharper handling of the 100 setting (71.5 deg head angle).
So, yes, I like the adjustablility of the TALAS, but I don't adjust it over a very wide range.
If it is, then in theory the best bike for slow, technical, rocky moves would be a fully rigid bike ala Alex at Spring Fling, right? You know exactly where the front wheel is and the steering is very precise. Or do I just have to adapt my riding style for the longer suspension?
I do like the the more stable feel of longer travel on fast, kinda rough descents, but if it's very curvy at all I still prefer the sharper handling of the 100 setting (71.5 deg head angle).
So, yes, I like the adjustablility of the TALAS, but I don't adjust it over a very wide range.