Mountain Bike Reviews Forum banner

1 - 20 of 31 Posts

·
Registered
Joined
·
456 Posts
Discussion Starter · #1 · (Edited)
Considering a Moonlander as my local distributor (in Australia) doesn't have any standard Pugs and i'm concerned the Bud and Lou might be a bit much for the tracks around my place (ie no snow).
Can i run say a 4" on-one Floater or 3.8" nate on those rims without any dramas?

cheers
Steve

Edit: while it's in here and not wanting to do another post (yes i searched), what tube would work for a split tube tubeless method? I'm very familiar with the process on 29er MTB's and even my rabbit holes. I only use Schwalbe tubes as i like the removeable cores. Will a 24" x 1.5-2.5" do it? was going to use Presta valve.
 

·
Location: SouthPole of MN
Joined
·
1,711 Posts
I have a friend running Floaters on 100's and they look good, and he likes them.
 

·
Registered
Joined
·
604 Posts
Yes you can but an ideal tire might be something more like the Specialized 4.6 ground control.
My Nates measure 4.1" (f) and 4.2" (r) on 90mm UMA. The Ground Controls measure 4.5" on the Specialized rims which I think are about the same, maybe 85mm. The weights appear to be very similar. The Ground Controls look much bigger volume than the Nates but quite a bit smaller than Bud/Lou. Ground Controls are at the top of my list right now to replace my Nates when the time comes, but at the rate my Nates are wearing that will be 2016 give or take a year.
 

·
aka bOb
Joined
·
8,813 Posts
My Nates measure 4.1" (f) and 4.2" (r) on 90mm UMA. The Ground Controls measure 4.5" on the Specialized rims which I think are about the same, maybe 85mm. The weights appear to be very similar. The Ground Controls look much bigger volume than the Nates but quite a bit smaller than Bud/Lou. Ground Controls are at the top of my list
I agree,100%!!
 

·
Registered
Joined
·
1,858 Posts
The bigger issue is the lowering of the bottom bracket due to using a smaller tire that has a reduced diameter.
 

·
Registered
Joined
·
1,095 Posts
Re: Moonlander + clown shoes + 4" tyres, work?

My Nates measure 4.1" (f) and 4.2" (r) on 90mm UMA. The Ground Controls measure 4.5" on the Specialized rims which I think are about the same, maybe 85mm. The weights appear to be very similar. The Ground Controls look much bigger volume than the Nates but quite a bit smaller than Bud/Lou. Ground Controls are at the top of my list right now to replace my Nates when the time comes, but at the rate my Nates are wearing that will be 2016 give or take a year.
What do you think of the nates on the 90mm rim? There are a few threads discussing that something in the 4" range for summer riding the handling is better with a 65mm rim due to the rounder profile.
 

·
Registered
Joined
·
456 Posts
Discussion Starter · #14 ·
I added a question at the top, basically what tube can i use for split tube method on clown shoes? will a 24" 1.5 to 2.5" do it? I can get a Schwalbe presta in this size from CRC
 

·
Registered
Joined
·
604 Posts
What do you think of the nates on the 90mm rim? There are a few threads discussing that something in the 4" range for summer riding the handling is better with a 65mm rim due to the rounder profile.
I've never ridden anything but 90mm rims, so I can't make a comparison. I mainly use my fat bike in the winter, although I did use if for 2 straight months this fall when my 29er was out of commission and they handled fine. If I was looking at mainly riding dirt I would think about 65-70mm rims just to lose some weight.
 

·
Registered
Joined
·
1,801 Posts
I used Schwalbe AV10D (24" x 3") for my split tube setup over Clown Shoe rims. I think Schrader valves are better suited for fat bikes anyways. I made the cut precisely at the outer "seam" and did not trim afterwards: the remaining flaps are minor (about 10 mm visible) and folded nicely against the tire by themselves.

It is possible that a smaller one up to 2.5" width would suffice, but I haven't tried it.

Once split, they were rather easy to put on the rims and would even move sideways. That got me thinking if I could get away with a 20 x 2.5" tube (Schwalbe AV7C at 95 grams a piece) for some weight savings compared to the AV10D at 260 grams a piece.
 

·
Registered
Joined
·
456 Posts
Discussion Starter · #17 ·
Thanks for that, i can get the AV10D's here but i do like the Prestas, mainly because i don't have a compressor and have always used C02 to do the initial inflate, then use a syringe to put the stans in.
 

·
Registered
Joined
·
1,640 Posts
Q-Tubes here. 24X2.75, presta. Saul Lumikko, I think you might be right about the 20" tubes. I would like to try it in a couple weeks when I redo all the tires in my stable but I have a stock of the 24"'s I need to use. Let me know if you try it.
 

·
Registered
Joined
·
1,801 Posts
Thanks for that, i can get the AV10D's here but i do like the Prestas, mainly because i don't have a compressor and have always used C02 to do the initial inflate, then use a syringe to put the stans in.
I don't have a compressor either. The AV10D are thick enough to allow the tire mount quite easily with a bit of sill foam underneath. The only tubeless thing I ever had to mount with a compressor were Hutchinson Atoms (23 mm road tubeless) on Ultegra wheels.

If you do mount the tire with a blast of CO2, be sure to deflate the tire and inflate it again (maybe a couple of times) before adding sealant: CO2 and sealant don't mix well.
 
1 - 20 of 31 Posts
Top