Joined
·
76 Posts
Hi there,
I am looking to pick up a new ride for the season. I am comming off a hardtail, so this will be my first full-suspension trailbike. I mainly ride rocky east coast singletrack, with lots of short technical climbs and descents. I don't go looking for drops, but I prefer not to shy away from smaller (2'-3') ones if they are on the trail. As well, I will often be commuting to the trailhead via road (a 10 mile or so ride).
I have secured a good deal through my work on two different bikes: the MKIII Comp or the Warrior DS Pro. I can get the Warrior DS for around $1000 CAD cheaper than the MKIII. That extra $1000 could go a long way towards a new seatpost, rear shock, and possibly wheelset or front fork for the Warrior DS. As well, I will be adding a lexan bashguard and my 2003 Shimano XT hydro brakes to either bike.
So, which is a better option? Splurge now on the MKIII and get better components and pedalling efficiency, or save $1000 and dump it into some bling bling upgrades for the DS?
Thanks,
A.
I am looking to pick up a new ride for the season. I am comming off a hardtail, so this will be my first full-suspension trailbike. I mainly ride rocky east coast singletrack, with lots of short technical climbs and descents. I don't go looking for drops, but I prefer not to shy away from smaller (2'-3') ones if they are on the trail. As well, I will often be commuting to the trailhead via road (a 10 mile or so ride).
I have secured a good deal through my work on two different bikes: the MKIII Comp or the Warrior DS Pro. I can get the Warrior DS for around $1000 CAD cheaper than the MKIII. That extra $1000 could go a long way towards a new seatpost, rear shock, and possibly wheelset or front fork for the Warrior DS. As well, I will be adding a lexan bashguard and my 2003 Shimano XT hydro brakes to either bike.
So, which is a better option? Splurge now on the MKIII and get better components and pedalling efficiency, or save $1000 and dump it into some bling bling upgrades for the DS?
Thanks,
A.