Welcome to the forums Jim!
The 150g advantage of holding on to a 26" rear wheel helps as much for acceleration as the larger front wheel deteriorates it. The difference is neglegible (sp?). Actually, the advantages associated to increasing wheelsize are of a much larger effect, even on acceleration, than it's weight alone.
It's been discussed on all frums before, and the consensus seems to be that 29/26 is better than 26/26, but when buying a new bike, it's really a waste to not get 29/29. Also, if you ever plan to race the bike, different wheel sizes on a bike are not allowed by the UCI.
Demo a capable 29" FS first, then decide.
It's quite had to not mess up the geometry of a 26" bike by fitting 29" parts to it. The bike will "never" handle like the designer had in mind. It may be great, but for other types of riding, and with less front suspension travel.
150 louzy grams...yeah that will turn a tank into a rocket alright! Especially with the extra weight being administered to the front anyway! Surprise surprise : once you get over it mentally, 29/29 bikes really do fine in getting up to speed.
150 grams to trade for over half the 29" advantages mentioned in the FAQ thread, is weight that important to you? Then use a 26" front wheel too, and get an equal rocket boost!
Too bad that most suspension frames add 1000g alone.
Don't be fooled by the weight in wheels counting stronger becaue of being rotational weight. It counts for double at best, and only for the time that you're ac(de)cellerating.
Specialized may be launching a 29" bike soon, why not wait for that, while riding a Lenz Behemoth or Leviathan, Titus Racer-X, Fisher Caliber or Sugar, Astrix Monk, etc, etc?
The 150g advantage of holding on to a 26" rear wheel helps as much for acceleration as the larger front wheel deteriorates it. The difference is neglegible (sp?). Actually, the advantages associated to increasing wheelsize are of a much larger effect, even on acceleration, than it's weight alone.
It's been discussed on all frums before, and the consensus seems to be that 29/26 is better than 26/26, but when buying a new bike, it's really a waste to not get 29/29. Also, if you ever plan to race the bike, different wheel sizes on a bike are not allowed by the UCI.
Demo a capable 29" FS first, then decide.
It's quite had to not mess up the geometry of a 26" bike by fitting 29" parts to it. The bike will "never" handle like the designer had in mind. It may be great, but for other types of riding, and with less front suspension travel.
150 louzy grams...yeah that will turn a tank into a rocket alright! Especially with the extra weight being administered to the front anyway! Surprise surprise : once you get over it mentally, 29/29 bikes really do fine in getting up to speed.
150 grams to trade for over half the 29" advantages mentioned in the FAQ thread, is weight that important to you? Then use a 26" front wheel too, and get an equal rocket boost!
Too bad that most suspension frames add 1000g alone.
Don't be fooled by the weight in wheels counting stronger becaue of being rotational weight. It counts for double at best, and only for the time that you're ac(de)cellerating.
Specialized may be launching a 29" bike soon, why not wait for that, while riding a Lenz Behemoth or Leviathan, Titus Racer-X, Fisher Caliber or Sugar, Astrix Monk, etc, etc?