The scene:
You own a car and the model you have is known to suffer from weak lower control arms that can snap at any moment.
The crime:
One day as you drive along it snaps causing a loss on control of your vehicle.
The question:
The dealer says admits nothing but says it will replaces the part with the exact same make of faulty lower control arm. Is this acceptable?
Forgive me for making assumptions of many of your behalves, but I'm going to guess this would not be acceptable. In the case of Jamis bikes why is it? and if you disagree how is the above scenario any different? Both carry a propensity of causing bodily harm and both do nothing to address and fix the problem.
You own a car and the model you have is known to suffer from weak lower control arms that can snap at any moment.
The crime:
One day as you drive along it snaps causing a loss on control of your vehicle.
The question:
The dealer says admits nothing but says it will replaces the part with the exact same make of faulty lower control arm. Is this acceptable?
Forgive me for making assumptions of many of your behalves, but I'm going to guess this would not be acceptable. In the case of Jamis bikes why is it? and if you disagree how is the above scenario any different? Both carry a propensity of causing bodily harm and both do nothing to address and fix the problem.