Mountain Bike Reviews Forum banner

Mileage Difference

1362 Views 20 Replies 10 Participants Last post by  Sidewalk
6 of us ride the same trail, and we have a half mile difference of mileage using Trailforks Over 10 miles. All on cell phones. Any ideas?
1 - 20 of 21 Posts
I always go with the one that records the most elevation and mileage.
  • Like
Reactions: 2
I see this all the time on rides. Phones are not that accurate when it comes to GPS activity. Close enough, but to perfect. As an experiment to eliminate how/where phones a stored on a ride, we took three of the same brand and model phones (rubber banded together), all running GPS Status & Toolbox (an Android app), and all three reported different coordinates, elevations, speed, etc. We only did this for maybe a mile, but it was enough to tell us that there will be significant differences over longer distances.
I see this all the time on rides. Phones are not that accurate when it comes to GPS activity.
Same here.

On one hand, a half mile difference over 10 miles is just 5% error, which is the rule-of-thumb for "close enough" in my industry. I might not worry much about it. BUT

My wife's and my Cateye cyclometers read within 0.06 miles of each other over a 23 mile ride this weekend. Sometimes low-tech is the best.
  • Like
Reactions: 1
I always go with the one that records the most elevation and mileage.
WHat if one gives more mileage, the other more gain?

(the situation with my GF and I)
I know where I ride if I briefly lose solid connectivity the app tries to extrapolate my distance between two points I'm guessing by just connecting them with a straight line....which may or may not be accurate....
this is why I always have a wheel sensor on my bikes. GPS really isn't for distance accuracy. I use GPS because I like maps (I do care about a reasonably accurate map, though). Distance accuracy is achieved with a wheel sensor (properly calibrated). I also like saving my ride data to look at later, and that's the other place that a GPS comes in handy compared to a regular cyclocomputer.

GPS distance recording is really not that accurate the way we use it for bike stuff. The faster you go, the less accurate it is (the more spread out your recorded points are). The more you turn, the less accurate it is (connect the dots around a curve cuts distance off). The more variation in your devices, the more discrepancy you'll have. Phone manufacturers are absolutely terrible about giving you any kind of specifications for the GPS hardware in them (processor OR antenna). Because that varies from one phone brand and model to another, the differences can be huge from that reason alone.
See less See more
  • Like
Reactions: 2
Interesting thread. I just ot a small cheap Chinese cyclometer that says it uses 3 satellites to track you. I wonder how this would compare to my phone. I might have to try this.
Interesting thread. I just ot a small cheap Chinese cyclometer that says it uses 3 satellites to track you. I wonder how this would compare to my phone. I might have to try this.
probably crap. if it can only handle 3 satellites at once, then there will be times you don't have a position fix. sometimes satellite geometry sucks and you need 4 or more for an actual position fix. that usually isn't a problem for modern GPS chipsets that can handle GPS sats plus Russian GLONASS birds and some even handle Euro Galileo sats in addition. that's a LOT of possible satellites to use for a position fix. if your cheapie can only use 3 sats for tracking, I wouldn't waste my money.

no, a wheel sensor is your answer.
  • Like
Reactions: 1
Yeah hard to beat a wheel sensor. Both my partner and I have Garmin 520s, mine with a wheel sensor and hers without. Mine always reports lower KMS than hers.
So far it has accurately tracked deviations to my routes. But this is not out in the wilderness or anything. I only got it to see if this is even something I wanted before spending money on a nice one.
So far it has accurately tracked deviations to my routes. But this is not out in the wilderness or anything. I only got it to see if this is even something I wanted before spending money on a nice one.
what's your threshold for "accurately"? pretty certain it's not anywhere in the same ballpark as mine.
You are correct that accurate is not the correct term here. I should have specified larger than a bread box change, lol, as I am not referring to small couple feet variations. Also not mileage. I can upload my data and see the map of my route. If I take a path that slightly different on the way back from the way to it will show it. For example, my driveway vs the side walk it shows this. Again I only got this cheap one because I wanted to see if I even wanted to get a cyclometer. I wasn't going to throw $200+ at something I didn't even know if I wanted.

I am liking being able to track my routes and speed and upload them to strava. I like being able to compare previous rides to my new one and break that down to smaller segments as well. Is that possible with a wired system?
This is the satellite info. I am not sure if it means 3 satellites or 3 types of satellite systems.

"the bike computer positioning system is connected to 3 satellite connectivity: GPS, GLONASS, Galileo." This type of stuff is foreign to me.
I have been using Strava on an iphone for years really just to keep a riding journal and track my improvement. But the mileage and time numbers I am getting are so far off with my iphone 11 that it is really annoying. My buddies with android phones usually have numbers about the same as each other and consistently 10% or more mileage than me. Yesterday I led the group all night but ended up getting as much as ten minutes more on some segments and two fewer miles on a 15 mile ride. It is really ridiculous to the point of not even being worth recording. I didn't really want to go to the trouble of bringing in another device, but my iphone 11 is about a waste of time.
Interesting thread. I just ot a small cheap Chinese cyclometer that says it uses 3 satellites to track you. I wonder how this would compare to my phone. I might have to try this.
Three satellites are the minimum required to location (longitude and latitude) along with elevation. If you don't need elevation, only 2 satellites are required.

Phones actually "can" track several satellites concurrently. Glancing at the GPS Status & Toolbox app I mentioned earlier, I can see my phone currently tracking to 18 satellites (14 with a fix) as I sit inside my home. If I were outside with a better view of the horizon, I'm sure it would track even more. Sounds impressive, but just because the GPS Status & Toolbox app is using all of these fixes doesn't mean other apps, like Trailforks, does. Trailforks may only use the minimum required for tracking position long/lat/elev, which as mentioned, is 3. The less data (fewer satellites) used, the less accurate. The other thing is, a trail map app probably isn't using all of the sat data in absolute real-time. In fact, there's a configurable setting in Trailforks to set satellite refresh, with is a default minimum of one second (it can be set for longer intervals to help slower phones). One second isn't terrible, but that's assuming the phone isn't busy doing something else. Apps like Trailforks have other things to do... displaying a map, logging data points, etc. There's only so much CPU power in a phone. What else is the phone doing? Facebook, Twitter, weather, phone service, messaging, email, etc., etc., all running in the background. Tracking multiple satellites and plotting their data could bog a phone down, so there's some trad-off taking place. All of these variables impact accuracy.

Something like a cyclometer is dedicated to one function, and can likely collect data points more frequently than an app on a phone. All of its focus is on that function. I would guess that it will always be more accurate than a multiple purpose device, like a phone, would be. The same can be said about dedicated GPS devices like those from Garmin.
See less See more
Thanks for the replies. It appears that when riding alone we get accurate mileage readings. Good laugh on that one.
Enjoy the coming snow, thanks again,
These Puddle Jumpers getting lazy with their modern GPS systems...
This is the satellite info. I am not sure if it means 3 satellites or 3 types of satellite systems.

"the bike computer positioning system is connected to 3 satellite connectivity: GPS, GLONASS, Galileo." This type of stuff is foreign to me.
Each of those is a constellation of satellites. each constellation has dozens of satellites in it. you can't connect to all of them at once (physically impossible because they're covering the whole globe). it also doesn't tell you how many the receiver can track at once, but it gives you more options to get a quality position fix when conditions are poor.

you have a combination of poor translation in the product description and lack of knowledge of what's actually going on. a potent combination, for sure.

Three satellites are the minimum required to location (longitude and latitude) along with elevation. If you don't need elevation, only 2 satellites are required.
a fix on 2 satellites does NOT give you a 2D position. That requires 3 satellites. 4 satellites is required for a 3D position (coords plus elevation).

How Does GPS Work? GPS for Dummies – HikingGuy.com

How GPS Determines Your Position
At a minimum, your GPS receiver needs three satellite signals (aka “fixes”) to determine your position, which is called trilateration.

Gps Circle A

With one signal, you can be anywhere within the surface of the sphere.
Gps Circle B

With two signals, you can be anywhere on the blue line where the two spheres intersect.
Gps Circle C

With three spheres, there are two intersection points. This is called trilateration. One fix will be on the Earth’s surface, the other one will be in space. The GPS chipset will discard the one in space and give back the position of the one on the surface. Garmin also calls this a 2-D position.
Gps Circle D

Adding a fourth satellite will give you one point of intersection, eliminating the need to discard the point in space. It will also allow the GPS to calculate elevation. This is sometimes referred to as your 3-D position. This fourth signal is also used to sync time. Most GNSS systems strive to have their satellite orbits distributed so that at least four satellites are always visible from any point on the Earth at any time for this reason.
You are correct that accurate is not the correct term here. I should have specified larger than a bread box change, lol, as I am not referring to small couple feet variations. Also not mileage. I can upload my data and see the map of my route. If I take a path that slightly different on the way back from the way to it will show it. For example, my driveway vs the side walk it shows this. Again I only got this cheap one because I wanted to see if I even wanted to get a cyclometer. I wasn't going to throw $200+ at something I didn't even know if I wanted.

I am liking being able to track my routes and speed and upload them to strava. I like being able to compare previous rides to my new one and break that down to smaller segments as well. Is that possible with a wired system?
No. a cheap wired cyclocomputer cannot do these things. The critical thing here is saving data from your ride. What GPS permits is recording where you are and at what time. Speeds and elevations can be calculated from that, and if you have other sensors, you can really start piling on the data. In the heydey of cyclocomputers, the most expensive ones could record, but any data they recorded had no position to associate with. Just time and distance. It gave some rudimentary analysis capabilities if you rode exactly the same route.
See less See more
  • Like
Reactions: 1
These Puddle Jumpers getting lazy with their modern GPS systems...
Puddle Pirate
1 - 20 of 21 Posts
This is an older thread, you may not receive a response, and could be reviving an old thread. Please consider creating a new thread.
Top