It's walmart. They don't give two ficks about any of that. Only that they buy it for $50 and sell for $125.
Just like all the other quality products you'll find there.
Just like all the other quality products you'll find there.
This is exactly why, in addition to the mountains of trash created....budget bike customers are likely to be the ones who can least afford to buy a new bike every year or so.
…We are tired of telling distraught customers and riders that their bikes are made too poorly to fix, and we are tired of seeing these bikes filling up our waste streams. Frankly, you should be ashamed of selling bikes that last some 90 riding hours.”
100% correct. From Sheldon Brown's website: Look at department store bikes... average 75 miles from purchase to landfill.To be fair most people who buy those bikes will lose interest in them well before 90 hours of use anyway. They know their market.
it's not always so simple. while this may be true on the surface, there are reasons behind it.To be fair most people who buy those bikes will lose interest in them well before 90 hours of use anyway. They know their market.
And how many have such a poor experience with the BSO they bought that they give up on bike riding while, if they had a decent bike, they would get into the sport.This is a really interesting story that presents a number of issues I never would have considered in the "bike shaped object" (BSO) market.
I would be curious to know the conversion rate from BSOs to better bikes. How many people buy a BSO, get bitten by the bike bug, and upgrade to something better that includes a relationship with an LBS?
Very good point! It could go either way I suppose!And how many have such a poor experience with the BSO they bought that they give up on bike riding while, if they had a decent bike, they would get into the sport.
I always feel kinda bad when I pass a commuter on a crap bicycle. I've got a basement full of bikes I use for fun that are so much better than the bike they depend on to get them to work.
depends on the market. where I have worked, these bikes often cost more to maintain than the initial cost of the whole bike. I've seen some $100 beach cruisers that were so mangled when customers brought them directly to us from Walmart that it would cost nearly another $100 to make them functional.These types of bikes literally keep local bikes shops in business.
it's not always so simple. while this may be true on the surface, there are reasons behind it.
one might be that those bikes suck so badly to ride that people lose interest.
the other might be a lack of safe, low-risk infrastructure for people to ride on.
the manufacturers can solve the first problem. the second one is a bigger problem with no easy solutions.
Yep, I work in commercial real estate. The cost to repair most appliances is not worth just replacing it.It's not just a problem with bikes. Major kitchen appliances are largely the same way. At this point, after 16 years in my house, I've had the repairman out to "service" everything in the kitchen. He told me, "we carry the brands we do because they're the only ones that will supply replacement parts. But, by the time I troubleshoot the problem and charge you for that work, the part, and install fee, you're probably better off just replacing the whole dishwasher, stove, oven...".
So require higher end bike manufacturers to dedicate resources to a product line intended to sell at a loss?I would say that quality bikes should be affordable to all who want them. This includes adults as well as/especially kids. Some people just want a simple bike, but go to Walmart because of the huge price tag in bike shops. I agree that cheap bikes cause more harm then good in many cases. I think this is not a crappy bikes manufacturer issue and should be more of a Bike industry mission. Yes there should be a standard.