There was a recent thread on this topic: http://forums.mtbr.com/showthread.php?t=525581
What are peoples views on the problem being solved in the new frames? Has anyone got an 09 frame? Has anyone heard anything about this problem being adressed and solved in the new frames?
My tone has been deliberately calm. If you want evidence of an attitude problem try digging up all of your own posts here and on Farkin.OK I tried to be nice but it seems from your tone that you want to escalate and *****.
I have made it perfectly clear that I have tried the remedies given me and have had no success. You are not reading my posts.My view is also that you don't seem to be willing to listen to any sort of constructive advice as to how you may be able to rectify your situation.
I have tried three posts that are easily held in other frames and theyall slip in the Niner. I have measured the seat tube nd it is bigger than my other frames.My view is that if you have checked the tolerances of the frame and seatposst and they are correct then it is not a manufacturing fault.
I've done that, as I clearly stated twicw in this thread.My view is that you need to contact Pete or Shannon or a competent bike mechanic and see if they can work out what the problem actually is.
As I have already stated in this thread, I have had good service with one exception which I clearly stated was not a defining moment.Shannon and Pete have always gone out of their way to help me and anyone of my mates who have a bike related problem (purchased from them or otherwise).
What are peoples views on the problem being solved in the new frames? Has anyone got an 09 frame? Has anyone heard anything about this problem being adressed and solved in the new frames?
Will not suddenly find more people who have the same problem.What are peoples views on the problem being solved in the new frames? Has anyone got an 09 frame? Has anyone heard anything about this problem being adressed and solved in the new frames?
Agree that obviously the clamping force is at the top as you mention, however the extra surface area being contacted by the longer post would add some friction. It could just simply be that the Thomson post I ended up with has a tighter tolerance than the other I tried too. I tried carbon paste, it did not work.cycleboy said:It doesn't seem like the post length would do much since all of the clamping force is at one spot near the top. Unless it just adds some friction. Sure adds a lot of useless weight though.
Thanks for the support Hud.Hud said:I don't want to get involved in the biffo but MC, before TR asked if you'd been in touch with Shannon and Pete you'd only referred to them as 'the dealer' who could've been anyone OS. Sometimes TR can be pretty blunt but he wasn't this time and was trying to help.
I know, I meant the emphasis to be on useless. If there's added weight that isn't serving a real function, it's useless in my way of thinking. Granted in your case it is solving a problem and therefore not truly useless, but useless in terms of having to do that to solve the problem.BP73 said:Not to be a smart A$# but I had to laugh about adding " A lot" of useless weight due to the longer post. Really its minimal, especially on a 28lb steel hard tail...![]()