Mountain Bike Reviews Forum banner

Maxxis Rekon MaxTerra vs Dual

6774 Views 21 Replies 15 Participants Last post by  JaxMustang50
I'm currently running a 2.6 Rekon in MaxTerra compound on the back of my Ibis Ripley AF and while it's good for the bulk of the trails I ride I've noticed it seems really draggy and slow on flat sections of hardpack trails. My previous bike was a XC hardtail I'm used to rolling fast through these sections. I'm wondering if I went from the MaxTerra to a dual compound Rekon if there would be noticeable difference in rolling resistance?

Another option would be moving the MaxTerra Rekon to the front and try a 2.6 Ikon on the back which I'm sure would be noticeably better. It just comes down to if I want to give up the Dissector on the front.
1 - 20 of 22 Posts
Yes, dual compound for the back will roll a bit faster. I’ve run them and they roll well. Alternatively, you could do an Ikon or Rekon Race for more speed and less grip. Wouldn’t recommend a Rekon on the front no matter the compound.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
I run a DC Rekon on the back of my hardtail — it rolls really well. I would not run a Rekon of any kind on the front, especially if you are used to a Dissector. It would be a huge reduction in braking and cornering grip.
The tricky thing for me with max is tires is that EXO+ and DD casings are not available in dual compound (save for a couple exceptions). Currently running an EXO+ Rekon which is great, but I’m worried about the durability of the tread, especially with the smaller knobs. Don’t run a Rekon on the front unless you are doing XC, or really want to break your ribs.
It is amazing how many people don’t like the Rekons on the front. They work great on my hardtail that sees hardpack, loose over hard and a bit of loose, with some pavement thrown in. Roll well and decent traction. Not big meaty traction, but that is what the Tail and DH bikes are for. The Rekon is the only Maxxis tire I have ever really liked.
  • Like
Reactions: 1
It is amazing how many people don’t like the Rekons on the front. They work great on my hardtail that sees hardpack, loose over hard and a bit of loose, with some pavement thrown in. Roll well and decent traction. Not big meaty traction, but that is what the Tail and DH bikes are for. The Rekon is the only Maxxis tire I have ever really liked.
Might just be local conditions, but I barely even trust a dissector on the front in my local dust.
I’m not sure if a traditional Rekon is any better, but I actually broke a rib in 2019 trusting a 2.8 Rekon+ front when it got dry and dusty! Great tire otherwise, but I really did not get along with it in those conditions.
Why not go with 2.4’s on your Ripley for less drag? I run rekon‘s rear dual compound on both my bikes, I like them a lot. My single speed has rekons front and rear, maxterra front and it actually does well out here in AZ, it is more of a xc bike though. I do have some specialized ground control t7’s coming that I think will great front tires and fast rolling. You could run one of those on the rear for a grippy, fast rolling rear.
Yes, dual compound for the back will roll a bit faster. I’ve run them and they roll well. Alternatively, you could do an Ikon or Rekon Race for more speed and less grip. Wouldn’t recommend a Rekon on the front no matter the compound.
I think for where I ride I'd be comfortable trying a Rekon on the front, especially in 2.6. I'm kind of intrigued to try an Ikon 2.6 on the rear while leaving the Dissector on the front but I'm wondering if that will be too much of a difference between front and rear tires in terms of grip?


The tricky thing for me with max is tires is that EXO+ and DD casings are not available in dual compound (save for a couple exceptions). Currently running an EXO+ Rekon which is great, but I’m worried about the durability of the tread, especially with the smaller knobs. Don’t run a Rekon on the front unless you are doing XC, or really want to break your ribs.
This was why I opted for the MaxTerra Rekon in the first place because I wanted to have a higher level of protection that EXO+ offers, however the more I think about the more I realize that a faster rolling tire is more important to me.

Why not go with 2.4’s on your Ripley for less drag? I run rekon‘s rear dual compound on both my bikes, I like them a lot. My single speed has rekons front and rear, maxterra front and it actually does well out here in AZ, it is more of a xc bike though. I do have some specialized ground control t7’s coming that I think will great front tires and fast rolling. You could run one of those on the rear for a grippy, fast rolling rear.
This was what I was originally thinking. I'm still looking at getting a 29mm or 30mm inner width wheelset to run give me the ability to run a wider range of tires, however I'm not sure that 2.4's do actually have less drag than 2.6's. Based on this test it shows otherwise.


I what I'd like to try first is a faster rolling tire setup in 2.6 as the larger volume tires should provide sufficient grip even in a more XC oriented tread pattern. At least based on everything I've read.
See less See more
In my experience the difference in rolling resistance between Maxx Terra and DC is pretty slight. I have run both in a 2.4 Rekon on my Tallboy and I doubt I'd have any idea which tire was installed based on the ride characteristics.
I'm contemplating running a Rekon Max Speed on the front of my 120mm travel trail bike. I've been running a Highroller II Max Terra on the front and it feels heavy. The High Roller grips well in the corners and brakes well too. I thought of replacing it with a Dissector but not a lot of difference although slightly lighter. I'm 67 and not smashing it anymore. Phoenix area conditions, local trails mostly.
The biggest difference is going to be in lifespan and cold weather performance. Dual compound is going to last longer but the harder rubber will struggle in cold conditions.
  • Like
Reactions: 1
It is amazing how many people don’t like the Rekons on the front. They work great on my hardtail that sees hardpack, loose over hard and a bit of loose, with some pavement thrown in. Roll well and decent traction. Not big meaty traction, but that is what the Tail and DH bikes are for. The Rekon is the only Maxxis tire I have ever really liked.
I know!!! I prefer it on the front, because I have hardtails and the Rekon gets beat up on the back. But I've had a 2.6 on the front and still going strong after 2500 miles. The only tire I've ever had where the side knobs are more worn than the center. It's amazing how well this tire does up front; I would not do a 2.4 on the front or anything, but it's really unusual for a tire like this to grip so well on the front for normal trail riding (not Enduro Bro stuff). The two things I notice are that it doesn't brake as good as a Minion when it's steeper and looser, and if it's an off-camber transition where the bike slides down to a different level, the Rekon's side knobs will not catch as well and it will slide down more. Those are the only two issues I've noticed, besides needing to keep the psi up for sure or it will get very mushy handling. But yeah this is such a great front tire if it's not gnarly. I've crashed less on a Rekon than on a DHF, I swear. And I'm riding loose trails just like pretty much everyone else in the Southwest, not a lot of rain this year. Having said that, the local grapevine is saying that there have been a lot of bad crashes lately, so I'm not recommending everyone put this on and go out jumping big stuff or anything, it's just for normal riding not ballsy major air action. Another impressive tire in this category is the Kenda Booster, and it's even lighter. Both tires are great for technical XC / light-duty trail.
See less See more
  • Like
Reactions: 1
Another impressive tire in this category is the Kenda Booster, and it's even lighter. Both tires are great for technical XC / light-duty trail.
That's another tire I'm pretty interested in. Possibly Regolith front and Booster rear both in 2.6. It would save me approximately 374 grams over my current tire combination.
  • Like
Reactions: 1
Another impressive tire in this category is the Kenda Booster, and it's even lighter. Both tires are great for technical XC / light-duty trail.
Would you say the Booster is closer to the Ikon or Rekon? I always assumed the Ikon.
Recently got a Rekon 29X2.40 Dual Exo / TR to replace the rear Forekaster on my Yt Izzo. It weighs 872 grams instead of the 800 listed on the Maxxis website. Are you seriously? Two rides on it - it seems to be good. On the trails where I ride a lot of rocks, and I'm basically happy with the grip. But the extra 130 grams after Forekaster is felt. Thinking I can bring Forekaster back. I also want to try Kenda Booster, but they are not available anywhere in stores.
That's another tire I'm pretty interested in. Possibly Regolith front and Booster rear both in 2.6. It would save me approximately 374 grams over my current tire combination.
The Regolith is a really weird tire. It's small-knobbed but spaced far apart. So almost like a studded semi-slick. I don't really understand the reason they made that tire. Reviews are pretty mediocre for it. Maybe it would be fine for 2.6, but the Rekon 2.6 3C is 730 grams, that's pretty hard to beat for what you are getting. Or even Booster 2.6 front...why not.
Would you say the Booster is closer to the Ikon or Rekon? I always assumed the Ikon.
It's definitely closer to the Rekon, because it has OK side knobs. The Ikon is a rear tire for sure. Maybe the 29x2.6 would be fine for the front, but anything less than that...playing with fire. I have a 2.35 on the front just for gravel and easy singletrack, but it's REALLY sketchy when it's loose at all. What I've realized putting the Ikon on the front is that I need at least a 'trail' side knob profile, if not an AM/DH one like a Minion, because if it's loose during a turn I really need the tire to hold on to something. If it has XC side knobs that ain't gonna happen, I have to go slower or it will skid off the trail. I consider the Rekon to have trail-worthy side knobs; not as beefy as a Dissector but good enough. Booster is a bit more XC-oriented; I've only had it on the rear but I think it would do better on the front than the Ikon. For the rear the side knobs don't really matter too much to me as long as the tire can slow down without locking up.
I think for where I ride I'd be comfortable trying a Rekon on the front, especially in 2.6. I'm kind of intrigued to try an Ikon 2.6 on the rear while leaving the Dissector on the front but I'm wondering if that will be too much of a difference between front and rear tires in terms of grip?
FWIW, I ran a 2.1 Specialized Ground Control rear and a 2.3 Butcher front for most of the past three years. I never felt like there was too much difference in grip between those tires.

I got a new (to me) bike this year, with an Aggressor rear and a Minion DHF front. I felt like I was riding in quicksand and just swapped to an older 2.6 Ground Control rear and 2.6 Eliminator front. I should know soon if the drag is from the 35mm rims and wider tires or the Aggressor/DHF combo.
FWIW, I ran a 2.1 Specialized Ground Control rear and a 2.3 Butcher front for most of the past three years. I never felt like there was too much difference in grip between those tires.

I got a new (to me) bike this year, with an Aggressor rear and a Minion DHF front. I felt like I was riding in quicksand and just swapped to an older 2.6 Ground Control rear and 2.6 Eliminator front. I should know soon if the drag is from the 35mm rims and wider tires or the Aggressor/DHF combo.
I actually just bought a new wheelset that's 30mm so I'm going to try a 2.4 Dissector on the front and a 2.35 Ardent Race on the rear.
1 - 20 of 22 Posts
This is an older thread, you may not receive a response, and could be reviving an old thread. Please consider creating a new thread.
Top