Mountain Bike Reviews Forum banner
1 - 3 of 3 Posts

·
Registered
Joined
·
421 Posts
Discussion Starter · #1 ·
Am looking at Karma as a rear (Nevegal on front). Nevegal is 2.1 and seems like a rear 2.1. Is the Karma true to its size as well. If so I would definitely choose 2.0, but....... Run a Crosmark 2.1 on rear now and seems more like a 1.95/2.0. Thanks
 

·
Registered
Joined
·
779 Posts
i have a 2.0 karma mounted on a stans rim at @30psi that is the same width/volume (visually) as a 2.1 Crossmark w/ tube @ 30psi on a standard WTB wheelset.
the karmas are a very high volume tire and feel much bigger than they are - similar in feel/response to the crossmark i might add.....

youll be happy with the volume of the 2.0

p.s. a Blue Groove is a better front tire IMO, especially in loose rock.
 
1 - 3 of 3 Posts
Top