Mountain Bike Reviews Forum banner
1 - 20 of 29 Posts

· Registered
Joined
·
1,981 Posts
Discussion Starter · #1 ·
Found this super interesting, another excellent video from Steve at Vorsprung:
Dear Bike Industry... Tuesday Tune Ep 34 - YouTube

I'm genuinely surprised that there are no present standards for shock loading and shock misalignment. No wonder some bike models are known to destroy shocks (cough: stumpjumper : cough). I'm sure the initial high leverage ratios that most bikes use today in order to get good small bump sensitivity don't help this situation in the least.
 

· Registered
Joined
·
1,787 Posts
Specialized is a shock serial killer, the 2010 Enduro started the whole concept of clevis mounts + crappy alignment.

I had one that was so bad that it would routinely unscrew air cans, kill seals, destroy shock shafts, and I even had it unscrew the piston on an RC4. Fun bike, but damn that thing ate shocks!

Bicycle Tire Bicycles--Equipment and supplies Wheel Land vehicle
 

· Registered
Joined
·
12,992 Posts
Oh man, that was a bad one in the dark days of mtb. Serious lack of engineering and or thought on that one.
View attachment 1964371


And to add insult to injury, the head tubes would pop off like popcorn.

I had one for 3 years. Never had any frame issues but the first shock lasted 4 rides. Went through 5 warranty replacements and 5 rebuilds before I got it reliable.
Interestingly for my one the only shocks that leaked out the shaft head were the new ones that came in an oil soaked box. Most failures were internal.

I still see it being ridden around town occasionally by the kids/grandkids of the guy who bought it from me over 20 years ago!
 

· Registered
Joined
·
127 Posts
but even current bikes might have some "issues".

this



resulted in



Propain Rage 2020, thread for this issue:
 

· Registered
Breezer Thunder, 1975 Sekine SHT 271, 1975 Sekine SHS SunTour VX Group Sugino Mighty Tour, tubeless
Joined
·
65 Posts
Oh dear, I knew many frames killed bearings due to poor tolerances. Shocks, too?

My friend's 2007 Jamis Dakar XCR Comp has extremely undersized bearing holes. The shock appears to be fine, thankfully. Well, as fine as a Fox Float R from 2007 can be, anyways.
 

· Formerly PaintPeelinPbody
Joined
·
3,272 Posts
I still don't understand why so many bikes insist on this these stupid high leverage ratios. The only justification I've heard is that it's easier to have a One Size Fits All shock tune on a high leverage bike than on a low leverage bike.
 

· Registered
Joined
·
1,981 Posts
Discussion Starter · #10 ·
I still don't understand why so many bikes insist on this these stupid high leverage ratios. The only justification I've heard is that it's easier to have a One Size Fits All shock tune on a high leverage bike than on a low leverage bike.
I thought it was to have good small bump sensitivity at the top of the travel and near the sag point plus the ability to have a more progressive curve to prevent bottom out better than with low or flat leverage ratio?
 

· Formerly PaintPeelinPbody
Joined
·
3,272 Posts
I've never heard about the relationship between leverage ratio and leverage CURVE, but I suppose with less ratio, you flatten the curve. That puts more of the bottom-out control into the shock.

Ironic, because it seems like in the efforts to make air shocks feel more like coils, that would be the easy option. Throw hydraulic bottom out into more shocks (like the upcoming Super Deluxe) and you can get more support without the high leverage ratio.

It should be noted that adding a few links to the mix can drastically change curves. You could, in theory, have a bike with 1:1 leverage ratio at sag that goes to 5:1 at bottom out (rising rate) or 1:5 (falling rate).
 

· Registered
Joined
·
269 Posts
Apparently, most modern shocks operate best around a leverage rate of 2.6 or so. Most of the good suspension designs hover around this figure, although there are some outliers. It's possibly a good compromise since it's high enough to overcome static friction efficiently, couple of tunes fit a wide group or riders, and it does not overload the shock too badly in any way.
 

· Registered
Joined
·
2,527 Posts
I should inspect the shock on my E29...

(Ohlins coil)
I've had my TTX on my Enduro for several years without issue. Its driven by a fairly long yoke. Ran the CTD for at least a year and a Monarch for a year without issue.
TTX does have a spherical bearing at the top though and the shock does move quite a lot through it's travel

 

· Registered
Joined
·
2,527 Posts
I still don't understand why so many bikes insist on this these stupid high leverage ratios. The only justification I've heard is that it's easier to have a One Size Fits All shock tune on a high leverage bike than on a low leverage bike.
It will be to get the required amount of travel from the packaging I guess. If need a 150mm travel rear and you can only fit a 57mm stroke shock in there then the leverage ratio will start high. Put a DH stroke in at 70mm and it drops but no one does that.
Could go all the way back to Foes Curnett or whatever they were called at 2:1 ish!
 

· Rides all the bikes!
Joined
·
4,773 Posts
I've had my TTX on my Enduro for several years without issue. Its driven by a fairly long yoke. Ran the CTD for at least a year and a Monarch for a year without issue.
TTX does have a spherical bearing at the top though and the shock does move quite a lot through it's travel
I've got about 5500 (800ish hours) miles on my 2018.
 
1 - 20 of 29 Posts
This is an older thread, you may not receive a response, and could be reviving an old thread. Please consider creating a new thread.
Top