been done already ... its called a dingle
Ahh... wait... because a spring loaded tensioner is only "set" for 1 straight path and would only be able to hit the gear in that path... so it wouldn't be able to stretch to the 2nd cog, even if I manually move it...eh? Is my thinking accurate?fishcreek said:not gonna work, unless you have two chainrings.
using a rear derailleur will work but not the common spring loaded tensioner.
No, it's not about the chainline. I will say this again and maybe you'll get it. It's all about chain wrap. The spring tension can barely hold the chain on the cog, that's why the tensioner says to use a chain as short as possible. If there is enough chain to skip, it will, with or without a tensioner. If the tensioner pushes down there will not be enough chain wrap. If the tensioner is pushing up, hard bumps will bounce the tensioner down; either way it will skip. There are tensioners designed to take up extra chain such as the Paul Melvin. Otherwise your stuck with one cog or need to use a derailleur. Now I'm not saying your idea will never work; it's just not designed to work that way and probably will skip.Roasted said:Ahh... wait... because a spring loaded tensioner is only "set" for 1 straight path and would only be able to hit the gear in that path... so it wouldn't be able to stretch to the 2nd cog, even if I manually move it...eh? Is my thinking accurate?
You need to use two chainrings and two cogs. You'll have to move the tensioner pulley over when you "shift" too. It doesn't take long, maybe 30 seconds on my bike.Roasted said:Ahh... wait... because a spring loaded tensioner is only "set" for 1 straight path and would only be able to hit the gear in that path... so it wouldn't be able to stretch to the 2nd cog, even if I manually move it...eh? Is my thinking accurate?
I have a DMR tesnion seeker on my converted bike and it's a lot stiffer than a derailleur. It uses a linear spring, not a coil.Roasted said:Do chain tensioners in single speed conversion kits typically have the same tension as your typical rear derailleur?
I would say the spring tension on a tensioner they are a bit weaker than that of the derailleur tensioner arm. The thing isyour comparing apples and oranges. Take a look at a derailleur on a bicycle. The chain wraps around the cassette cog and is held in place by the jockey pulley. The tensioner arm and pulley pulls the chain down and away from the cassette, but the jockey pulley acts as a pivot for the chain, so even though the tensioner arm is pulling the chain down, it does not decrease the chain wrap. Now push the tensioner arm forward; what will happen is the jockey pulley will actually rock forward, increasing the chain wrap. In other words, a derailleur performs two functions (well three actually); one function (or pulley) to control chain wrap and another function (pulley) to tension the chain. A spring tensioner has to perform both functions and does neither very well. :thumbsup:Roasted said:Ah, I see. I understand where you're coming from.
Rookie question here - Do chain tensioners in single speed conversion kits typically have the same tension as your typical rear derailleur? I don't have my chain tensioner shipped in yet but I wasn't sure if it gave comparable results in terms of tension.