I remember that having my daughter sit on a child seat on the top tube of my suspension bike made the suspension work better. Didn't mean it was a good thing.Gasp4Air said:By removing the rear derailleur and cassette, the mass is relocated between the riders feet and away from the suspension, which gives much better small bump response, as well as increased grip and cornering ability," Holloway explains.
While interesting, there was no mention of it actually being tested on a bike. That, combined with the above quote, make me more than a little dubious. :skep:
Yes, I didn't mean to bash too hard on the impractical. Many paradigm shifts in technology (horse to bike, horse to car, flight, space travel, computers) were not at first practical, but somebody saw the potential, ignored the naysayers, and developed it anyway. I'd love to play with the above adjustable chainring, but at present do not see it being adventageous. That doesn't mean that the idea can't be pursued further, to bring it to the point where it is practical. It also may currently be practical for his purposes but not for mine. Innovation sometimes looks ridiculous for the first 100 or 1000 iterations before it begins really working well.schnee said:I love engineers who figure out what's possible, rather than always limiting themselves to what's merely practical.