Just for interest, can you tell us what the new numbers are, and the reasons that led you to the new numbers? Thanks!n10'sGuy said:Proto #2: HA, ST changed. CS shortened.
Great to hear that you're experimenting with the numbers before going to production. No better way to do it.n10'sGuy said:
I'll bet that with a photo in another direction, the clearance isn't as tight as it might seem. I cannot imagine Intense designing a bike with out factoring in clearence. Especially knowing they shortened the c/s on this prototype.Soupboy said:of the rear tire clearance. Looks awfully tight.
I friend of mine has a 26 Spider and complains about how susceptible it is to junk damming up around the lower pivot/swingarm area. He's gonna try to fabricate something out of plastic to reduce the buildup.shiggy said:Just find some reviews on the 26" Spider. And remember: PROTOTYPE
No not yet, this bike was just built Weds and will be ridden this weekend with the Reba from the other 29r, waiting to get more RS forks for side by side testing, R building a 26 spider with identical setups to side by side comparo.shiggy said:Are you able to swap the rear triangle between the two proto frames to try the different geo. combo?