Joined
·
4,388 Posts
Hi. My rigid 29er is working now (and working better than at first), but the brakes are suspect still.
I'm using XT m765 brakes with a 180mm A2Z rotor in front and the XT 160mm rotor in the rear. Initially, I had eBay generic/organic pads. These faded/smoked during my first decent descent (~500-600' maybe?). Since then, I rescuffed the rotors, cleaned with alcohol, and installed new shimano xtr organics. I bedded them lightly before riding trails. They're certainly working better, but on a recent & similar descent, the front began to fade a bit -- no burning smell, but the lever got a bit soft near the end, and the rear rotor looks like it was baked a bit (slightly tinted color since last descent.)
Other details: 195lb (geared up) rider on Northern California XC trails, some reasonably steep & long. Since it's fully rigid, I brake pretty regularly while descending. Wheels are respectably light 36 hole type.
I think the rotor diameter should be adequate, as I've managed very well with my165mm/145mm rotors on my 26er (older Hope minis are still working well). I'm open to trying a different composition pad, or replacing the front rotor with a more effective design if need be.
Questions: What do I need to do to get the optimal performance from these brakes? -- should the 180mm A2Z rotor work fine, or are they (A2Z rotors) less efficient than more expensive/different type rotors? Is the organic compound not ideal (felt good but seems prone to heating up too much)? Would a larger rear rotor solve my problems? With the somewhat narrow brake track, are these brakes destined by design to over-heat no matter the pad composition? Can I expect better performance from another pad maker/composition, and if so which one? Lastly, any rotor damage concerns by switching to a different pad compound? (This last question comes after the LBS showed me a few trashed rotors that were supposed to be the result of using metallic pads.)
Thanks for sharing your detailed experiences with these seemingly quality brakes.
105mm
I'm using XT m765 brakes with a 180mm A2Z rotor in front and the XT 160mm rotor in the rear. Initially, I had eBay generic/organic pads. These faded/smoked during my first decent descent (~500-600' maybe?). Since then, I rescuffed the rotors, cleaned with alcohol, and installed new shimano xtr organics. I bedded them lightly before riding trails. They're certainly working better, but on a recent & similar descent, the front began to fade a bit -- no burning smell, but the lever got a bit soft near the end, and the rear rotor looks like it was baked a bit (slightly tinted color since last descent.)
Other details: 195lb (geared up) rider on Northern California XC trails, some reasonably steep & long. Since it's fully rigid, I brake pretty regularly while descending. Wheels are respectably light 36 hole type.
I think the rotor diameter should be adequate, as I've managed very well with my165mm/145mm rotors on my 26er (older Hope minis are still working well). I'm open to trying a different composition pad, or replacing the front rotor with a more effective design if need be.
Questions: What do I need to do to get the optimal performance from these brakes? -- should the 180mm A2Z rotor work fine, or are they (A2Z rotors) less efficient than more expensive/different type rotors? Is the organic compound not ideal (felt good but seems prone to heating up too much)? Would a larger rear rotor solve my problems? With the somewhat narrow brake track, are these brakes destined by design to over-heat no matter the pad composition? Can I expect better performance from another pad maker/composition, and if so which one? Lastly, any rotor damage concerns by switching to a different pad compound? (This last question comes after the LBS showed me a few trashed rotors that were supposed to be the result of using metallic pads.)
Thanks for sharing your detailed experiences with these seemingly quality brakes.
105mm