I seem to, yet again, have missed the whole point.
I'm still not sure what the point of the original post was. Perhaps it was a snide reference to men being led by their hormones or a pithy observation on the nature of men or just a plain "oh brother" or just catty but I saw nothing "funny."
When I look at this girl I see classic statuary, beautiful skin tones, acuity. The nipple is lovely but hardly the point of the image; it is incidental unless, as my Anthro teacher used to say, one had an ax to grind.
I wonder if gofarther really meant to use the word "funny." That could be what threw everything off. It makes her sound really superior; grudgingly indulgent of the childish appitites of males. Unfortunatly it neglects a fine appreciation where it is entirely possible or even paramount. It even smacks of resentlment but then, "I seem to, yet again, have missed the whole point."
I'm just no fun sometimes. Sorry.