Your bike just texted me and wrote that frankly you're not at the level it wants you to be at.
x2Poncharelli said:http://www.mtbr.com/cat/bikes/xc-suspensio/haro/shift-r3/PRD_413153_1526crx.aspx
I think it depends what class you are racing. If you just started and racing beginner, just keep racing it like it is. Most other beginners have similar bikes.
But if you're racing sport, most other racers start having pretty nice/light bikes. Then you're probably better off selling that bike and buying a hardtail, especially if you're on a budget. Seems that you're bike was more built for durability, budget, and fun; but not racing. It also appears to be a heavy frame (7 pounds, I'm guessing?), so you'll have to get pretty bling parts to get it light. At the end, it's kinda like putting Pirelli's on a Pinto.
I knew a sport guy who raced on an LX steel Rock-hopper with $100 WTB wheels (that was his race upgrade), and passed an awful lot of 5-6K$ bikes on his way to the podium. Hardtail is the best way to get racing performance at a low price. Having a strong engine helps as well.
The steel Rockhoppers had the same tubeset as the steel Stumpjumpers, only the Stumpjumper were welded in Japan, and the Rockhoppers Taiwan. Actually quite race-able.Poncharelli said:https://www.mtbr.com/cat/bikes/xc-suspensio/haro/shift-r3/PRD_413153_1526crx.aspx
.
I knew a sport guy who raced on an LX steel Rock-hopper with $100 WTB wheels (that was his race upgrade), and passed an awful lot of 5-6K$ bikes on his way to the podium. Hardtail is the best way to get racing performance at a low price. Having a strong engine helps as well.