Mountain Bike Reviews Forum banner

1 - 8 of 8 Posts

·
Registered
Joined
·
43 Posts
Discussion Starter #1
What are your thoughts on DOT approved helmets vs. full face bike helmets for downhill? Is there much of a difference in protection?
 

·
moaaar shimz
Joined
·
9,125 Posts
You mean regular helmets compared to full face helmets? If that's it then there is a lot of difference.

FF helmets cover the entire head and give chin protection, essential for those "oh shi*" situations in which you faceplant. The disadvantages are weight and ventilation

Almost everyone will recommend Troylee Designs helmets because of their protection, comfort and ventilation, but that's just if your pocket can afford it.

I recommend the Giro Remedy line, the Azonics and some 661's.
 

·
Registered
Joined
·
43 Posts
Discussion Starter #3
tacubaya said:
You mean regular helmets compared to full face helmets? If that's it then there is a lot of difference.

FF helmets cover the entire head and give chin protection, essential for those "oh shi*" situations in which you faceplant. The disadvantages are weight and ventilation

Almost everyone will recommend Troylee Designs helmets because of their protection, comfort and ventilation, but that's just if your pocket can afford it.

I recommend the Giro Remedy line, the Azonics and some 661's.
I meant the difference between CSCP and Dot/Snell approved helmets. For example, the difference between the TLD D2 and the SE. One is bicycle specific and the other is a moto X helmet. Is the protection that much better with the SE to warrant the extra cost, weight, heat?
 

·
Oh, So Interesting!
Joined
·
5,094 Posts
I asked Bell about that after buying a Bellistic. The ff bike helmets are subject to the same standards as xc helmets, just cover more of your head. DOT/Snell standards are tested at higher speeds, I think its 35 mph for bikes, 60 or 70 for moto helmets. It seems ff bike helmets might vary a lot on how much protection you actually get.
 

·
Registered
Joined
·
43 Posts
Discussion Starter #5
davec113 said:
I asked Bell about that after buying a Bellistic. The ff bike helmets are subject to the same standards as xc helmets, just cover more of your head. DOT/Snell standards are tested at higher speeds, I think its 35 mph for bikes, 60 or 70 for moto helmets. It seems ff bike helmets might vary a lot on how much protection you actually get.
I currently have a Bellistic. The lower part that protects the jaw seems pretty flexible and weak. The helmet does not feel as sturdy as a moto helmet and is not that much lighter. I question how well it would protect if impacting a rock at high speed.
 

·
Oh, So Interesting!
Joined
·
5,094 Posts
fastNdirty said:
I currently have a Bellistic. The lower part that protects the jaw seems pretty flexible and weak. The helmet does not feel as sturdy as a moto helmet and is not that much lighter. I question how well it would protect if impacting a rock at high speed.
Bellistic, 2 lbs Mid-line fiberglass Bell moto helmet, 3.5 lbs. High-end, about 3 lbs.

I'm just a recreational rider, if I was racing dh or going really fast/big I'd look for something with better protection than the Bellistic, just my opinion... Check out what dh racers use...
 

·
Registered
Joined
·
199 Posts
Garcia was riding Bellistic for quite long time. He is fine so...
Ok. We was riding bit of a nice track. Friend (we all had bellistics) went down fast, jumped out and flied to high/to short to made it to the good landing. Fork took all it could (150mm) and he hit the ground hard (head first). I was really scared! I ran to see if hes ok, and he almost was (look of his face was really freaking when he started to move). For me it was a good test of a Bellistic 2006. Helmet did allright so iam still using mine with confidence.
BTW Friend did more crashes, his helmet looks used (lots of scratches) but its not broken or smth.
I do like TLDs, who doesnt ;) but iam happy with my bellistic (and i know its xc a like helmet).
 
1 - 8 of 8 Posts
Top