Joined
·
820 Posts
I've read the term "rotaional weight" thrown out a few times in posts about wheels or rims. What it is the word on how it specificly affects the ride feel in terms of physics or just plain english?
Just curious, I have a King 20mm frt and a HD Funbolt rear laced up to a set of 823 rims. The wheelset weighs 2280g's. Ive seen Kings laced to 819's that way around 1900g's, add a QR for the rear and its around 2000 grams. Is the King/823 set considered to heavy for an all-mountain bike wheelset?SHIVER ME TIMBERS said:me 210 pound rider
heavy Double tracks, big tires, and thick heavy tubes...hard to get the bike rolling...pedaling sucks
went tubeless (lighter rims....... no heavy, thick tubes)...sections I couldn't pedal up before are a breeze...I am not as tired pedaling in general. Bike is more responsive for changes of speed..........
personally if my rim (Mavic EX823) holds my a$$ and stays in true....then it should work for you
I've spent a lot of time on a Hadley/Mag 30 wheelset with Minions and downhill tubes. The Mag 30's are bombproof rims, but pedalling uphill or even on the flats is not much fun. I'm going tubeless with a new Mavic 823 wheeset.drumstix said:Just curious, I have a King 20mm frt and a HD Funbolt rear laced up to a set of 823 rims. The wheelset weighs 2280g's. Ive seen Kings laced to 819's that way around 1900g's, add a QR for the rear and its around 2000 grams. Is the King/823 set considered to heavy for an all-mountain bike wheelset?
More rotational mass makes the bike feel even heavier once it starts moving. It's harder to get the wheels to start rolling, it's harder to get the wheels to stop rolling. More unsprung mass, which means the suspension isn't going to perform as well. But the weight will also make the bike more stable.LoozinSkin said:I've read the term "rotaional weight" thrown out a few times in posts about wheels or rims. What it is the word on how it specificly affects the ride feel in terms of physics or just plain english?