Mountain Bike Reviews Forum banner

1 - 20 of 108 Posts

·
Registered
Joined
·
2,811 Posts
Fantastic looking bike. Odd that MTBR can't be bothered to post the work of a legend Like Brent Foes but they have a ton of piddly stuff on the front page.
 

·
Registered
Joined
·
131 Posts
Fantastic looking bike. Odd that MTBR can't be bothered to post the work of a legend Like Brent Foes but they have a ton of piddly stuff on the front page.
I agree the Ridgeback looks badass Would love to test one out.

I'd imagine companies have to pay MTBR for front page content. Foes really doesn't need to advertise, word of mouth and quality not quantity applies. I think Brent likes it that way and so do I.
 

·
Just Ride!
Joined
·
1,248 Posts
I have ridden hardtails for ever and have often thought about getting a full suspension bike... This is the first thing I have seen that has motivated me to think more seriously about it.
 

·
Registered
Joined
·
2,811 Posts
Any news out there on when these will be available? My broken Lynskey FS is due back from repair today but I'd rather spend the effort on a durable frame from my favorite builder.
 

·
Got rocks?
Joined
·
823 Posts
I stopped by the shop a while back to check out a mixer and i think they are getting closer. They had pieces of ridgebacks all over getting ready.
 

·
fraid of heights
Joined
·
1,841 Posts
Can't really blame mtbr for not having something on the bike when Foes website doesn't have any info on the bike other than "pre order now", then nothing else... (I miss the days when bike makers went to Interbike and MTBR.com had all the coverage, it was cool! Course the flip side is we get new bikes all year long now...?)

The Ridgeback "looks" like a cool bike. Looks to be several out in the wild. But I don't see any testing or reviews yet? Someone mentioned theirs being 2lbs heavier than a 5010. I assume that's a carbon to aluminum comparison. (I think there is also an aluminum 5010 available?) Don't know how much of that was build difference? And don't know enough about the Ridgeback to know if that's an apples to apples comparison to a 5010. (the newest 5010 is longer travel and more aggressive geo so maybe? Sort of almost took over for the last bronson and the bronson got a little bigger/badder, etc.) 2 lbs isn't the end of the world, but it's a higher penalty than I'd expect. Makes me wonder how effective all the machining and assembly work is? I mean it's awesome! No doubt about that... Anyway, would be cool to see some for sure apples to apples weight comparisons.

The same facebook post on the Ridgeback mentions the weight was worth it because of it pedaling better than the 5010. I know suspension kinematics and dampeners have come a long way and just about any suspension design can be made effective these days. But it would still take some back to back test riding to convince me a linkage driven SP pedals better than a dual mini link bike? (course maybe if it was a first gen 5010/SOLO, but still from all reviews they "pedaled" very well, just could be a little harsh depending on the rider/shock tune)

Anyway, I could see someone saying it pedals good enough that the difference doesn't matter? But new SC bikes seem to pedal pretty amazing to me?
 

·
The Fastest of Bananas
Joined
·
1,792 Posts
Can't really blame mtbr for not having something on the bike when Foes website doesn't have any info on the bike other than "pre order now", then nothing else... (I miss the days when bike makers went to Interbike and MTBR.com had all the coverage, it was cool! Course the flip side is we get new bikes all year long now...?)

The Ridgeback "looks" like a cool bike. Looks to be several out in the wild. But I don't see any testing or reviews yet? Someone mentioned theirs being 2lbs heavier than a 5010. I assume that's a carbon to aluminum comparison. (I think there is also an aluminum 5010 available?) Don't know how much of that was build difference? And don't know enough about the Ridgeback to know if that's an apples to apples comparison to a 5010. (the newest 5010 is longer travel and more aggressive geo so maybe? Sort of almost took over for the last bronson and the bronson got a little bigger/badder, etc.) 2 lbs isn't the end of the world, but it's a higher penalty than I'd expect. Makes me wonder how effective all the machining and assembly work is? I mean it's awesome! No doubt about that... Anyway, would be cool to see some for sure apples to apples weight comparisons.

The same facebook post on the Ridgeback mentions the weight was worth it because of it pedaling better than the 5010. I know suspension kinematics and dampeners have come a long way and just about any suspension design can be made effective these days. But it would still take some back to back test riding to convince me a linkage driven SP pedals better than a dual mini link bike? (course maybe if it was a first gen 5010/SOLO, but still from all reviews they "pedaled" very well, just could be a little harsh depending on the rider/shock tune)

Anyway, I could see someone saying it pedals good enough that the difference doesn't matter? But new SC bikes seem to pedal pretty amazing to me?
I honestly dont care about 2 pounds at the frame. It matter the least on the frame. My Foes hardtail is about 27 pounds, but feels like when riding.

I agree though l, the website should have geometry, and more info.

They, ideally, would have a few test bikes to send to Bike mags, or at least YouTube bike channels to go through. You cant compete with the larger brands without gains some traction with the media channels. At least enough, that when a potential customer Google searches for that bike, it would show up. I am aware that most Foes bikes are repeat customers, but still. The ridgeback has massive curb appeal, is modern, and honestly a great deal. It could be a popular frame. Hell, I want one, and I'm normally into carbon superbikes.

Sent from my SM-G955U using Tapatalk
 

·
Registered
Joined
·
2,457 Posts
I just made the switch to an aluminum frame which was 2.75lbs heavier than the carbon one it replaced. The extra weight was nothing......

Aluminum frames seem to be $800+ cheaper than their counter parts. I would spend the money saved on the aluminum frame on better wheels, brakes, fork, etc. Those 3 things make a much greater difference in the ride than frame weight.
 

·
Registered
Joined
·
2,811 Posts
I really like the look of this bike but I was expecting it to be a 29/27.5+ compatible design; apparently you have to choose one or the other.
 

·
The Fastest of Bananas
Joined
·
1,792 Posts
I really like the look of this bike but I was expecting it to be a 29/27.5+ compatible design; apparently you have to choose one or the other.
I'm pretty sure that's not true. Did you call them?

It's just 27.5 or 29/27.5+

Sent from my SM-G955U using Tapatalk
 

·
Registered
Joined
·
131 Posts
I thought I read that the Ridgeback is designed to fit up to 2.6 tires.
But I can fit a 2.6 on my Mixer Trail with plenty of clearance and the Mixer Trail is supposedly designed for up to a 2.4 tire.
Curious to know if the Ridgeback 29 is actually capable of fitting 27.5+.
 

·
Registered
Joined
·
2,811 Posts
I'm pretty sure that's not true. Did you call them?

It's just 27.5 or 29/27.5+

Sent from my SM-G955U using Tapatalk
Yes, I went through the pre-order process with them and they asked if I wanted 27.5 or 29. I may have made up the 27.5+ part, I'm old and I've been shopping a number of bikes but I recall very clearly the tire size question.
 
1 - 20 of 108 Posts
Top