Been thinking a lot about bike fitting and riding position for climbing vs descending. Seems that some of the common practices are to get the front of the knee directly above the pedal spindle, and the saddle directly under the sits bones when sitting upright on the bike. Both of those tend to be done when the bike is in a flat riding position with shock in firm. Seems like it would make more sense to have the knee over the spindle and saddle in a horizontal position when the bike is on an angle similar to the trail that you typically climb, and the shock in the mode you typically climb in (open for me). Does that make any sense? Has anyone played with that concept? I'm sure the obvious answer is "try it", which I plan to do, but thought I'd see what others have experienced.
I know on my Ripmo the knee is definitely forward of the spindle when the bike is on flat ground unless I slam the seat back just past the recommended seat position on my WTB Volt. I'm 5'11" on a Large so I'm quite sure the frame is good for me. But I bet if the bike was tipped upward on an incline similar to my local trails the knee would be better relative to the spindle, and I'm wondering if I tip the saddle very slightly forward if that wouldn't make more sense so that it's level while climbing?
I know on my Ripmo the knee is definitely forward of the spindle when the bike is on flat ground unless I slam the seat back just past the recommended seat position on my WTB Volt. I'm 5'11" on a Large so I'm quite sure the frame is good for me. But I bet if the bike was tipped upward on an incline similar to my local trails the knee would be better relative to the spindle, and I'm wondering if I tip the saddle very slightly forward if that wouldn't make more sense so that it's level while climbing?