I liked mine- very stiff frame and easy to work in the slow-techy sections. Construction was solid. I owned a TNT Flux at the same time. The Flux climbed faster but was lighter and the tubes felt less stiff (slightly lighter frame) but still a fun bike. The DWL will probably climb the best and is the design I like the best now, by a fair margin. The Salty bobbed quite a bit in middle ring under power.
The BB is a bit high but I liked that about the Salty. The front is lighter but again- I liked that for the slow-techy stuff and I had the Flux for the faster trails. I'm willing to bet the Salty had a shorter wheelbase- it actually turned quite well and was very nimble. It is an awesome trailbike, with MY only knock being the suspension bobbing and sagging a bit too much under power and on steep climbs. It actually climbed well in granny, oddly enough. Middle ring was not as good. The stiffness helped it descend well but the high BB makes it a bit tip-prone. The Flux had a lowish BB and was more stable and fast but again, not as stiff.
The BB is a bit high but I liked that about the Salty. The front is lighter but again- I liked that for the slow-techy stuff and I had the Flux for the faster trails. I'm willing to bet the Salty had a shorter wheelbase- it actually turned quite well and was very nimble. It is an awesome trailbike, with MY only knock being the suspension bobbing and sagging a bit too much under power and on steep climbs. It actually climbed well in granny, oddly enough. Middle ring was not as good. The stiffness helped it descend well but the high BB makes it a bit tip-prone. The Flux had a lowish BB and was more stable and fast but again, not as stiff.