Modulation shmodulation.. 225? Don't even consider - go for at least 8". That's quite a mass to stop. Go easy on those carbs unless you are r e a l l y tall, or just ride more.HuffyMan said:i'll be ordering some Avid BB7s soon and because i weigh 225#s i was considering an 8" front disc. However will the added stopping torque of the 8" disc reduce modulation? id prefer modulation over raw stopping power. any advice?
He is talking about a bb7 setup.dogonfr said:Deffinatly go with the 8in rotor in the front & 7in on thre rear.
Galfer wave rotors, they rule, http://www.galferusa.com/
If you need more power after that Galfer makes steel braided hoses & pads.
Thanks maybee i should join my kids in school & learn how to read!!damion said:He is talking about a bb7 setup.
The Reba has 32 mm stanchions and the web site considers it to be an All-Mountain fork. Avid's web site says that the 185 mm (7 inch) disc brake is for use with "Extreme" riding and the 203 mm (8 inch) is for use with "Downhill".HuffyMan said:hrm looks like its pretty cut adn dry, eh? theyll be on a RS Reba SL. i read through the manual and i can't find anything where it limits what size disc to use. It just says use disc brakes according to their manufacturer's spec.
Darn, meant 7", 7" not 8". The inch/metric thing got me there.Call_me_Clyde said:The Reba has 32 mm stanchions and the web site considers it to be an All-Mountain fork. Avid's web site says that the 185 mm (7 inch) disc brake is for use with "Extreme" riding and the 203 mm (8 inch) is for use with "Downhill".
Again, I'd say you're pretty safe in using the 7 inches, and as others mentioned, you could probably get a way with the 8 inches, but again, voiding the warranty on either product would be my concern if you went with larger than 7 inches.
Copello mentioned going for "at least 8 inches". Should you find the disc brakes with the elusive 9 inch or 10 inch rotors, I say buy 'em. You'll probably be the only guy on the boards that owns a set.
I hope this helps.
Bob
Couldn't resist busting your shoes a bit. No harm, no foul.copello said:Darn, meant 7", 7" not 8". The inch/metric thing got me there.
Sorry for misleading there for a while. The 8 in 185 confused me. 8" is indeed more for DH and will put a lot of load on a Reba. A 185, 7", is still a major upgrade from a 6" and should suit you fine.
Sorry
Humbly taken with my tail between the legs..Call_me_Clyde said:Couldn't resist busting your shoes a bit. No harm, no foul.
Bob
If I only had a dime for every time I had to walk away humbled, I'd be a millionaire. Read the tag line at the end of my post and that should put it all into perspective.copello said:Humbly taken with my tail between the legs..
On a XC / light trail bike, the 185mm/160mm combo should work out just fine. Especially if you're looking for more modulation. I think most QR forks advise against using 200+mm rotors.HuffyMan said:i'll be ordering some Avid BB7s soon and because i weigh 225#s i was considering an 8" front disc. However will the added stopping torque of the 8" disc reduce modulation? id prefer modulation over raw stopping power. any advice?
My guess would bee the extra torque could crack the lowers, or caliper mount on the fork, if left unchecked the crack could lead to a really nice face plant when it eventually breaks all the way.el_chupo_ said:thread hijacker asks- What bad can happen by running too big a rotor on a fork? I have a marz MX pro ETA and want to run 7" disc. Manual says 6 inch limit.
Thansk and sorry to poster....