Mountain Bike Reviews Forum banner

1 - 20 of 22 Posts

·
Registered
Joined
·
8 Posts
Discussion Starter #1
Hi I got a 2010 specialized sworks epic .. very nice bike with the e100 brain fork ... the fork works good but if I take a few jumps I drop from 125psi to 80psi... if I ride normal it hold 125psi the whole time.. only losses pressure when iam jumping any thing I can..

We do mostly trails.. road and offroad not very much downhill.. dont have facilities where I stay..


I can get one for a good price and it will look good on bike. Reason why I want dh fork is looks..

I dont know if it would work on my bike and the conditions I ride.. I believe the dh fork has no lock out... I dont know if that would be an issue.

My question is could I put a down hill fork in or not?
 

·
Banned
Joined
·
976 Posts
Hi I got a 2010 specialized sworks epic .. very nice bike with the e100 brain fork ... the fork works good but if I take a few jumps I drop from 125psi to 80psi... if I ride normal it hold 125psi the whole time.. only losses pressure when iam jumping any thing I can..

We do mostly trails.. road and offroad not very much downhill.. dont have facilities where I stay..


I can get one for a good price and it will look good on bike. Reason why I want dh fork is looks..

I dont know if it would work on my bike and the conditions I ride.. I believe the dh fork has no lock out... I dont know if that would be an issue.

My question is could I put a down hill fork in or not?
Totally, go for it

Sent from my moto g(7) power using Tapatalk
 

·
Registered
Joined
·
8 Posts
Discussion Starter #3
Totally, go for it

Sent from my moto g(7) power using Tapatalk
Thanks buddy .

You dont think it would change my bike geometry too much?

And be spongy when cycling hard due to no lock out?


Sent from my SM-N970F using tiny.cc/Mtbr_android_app
 

·
Bikes in jeans
Joined
·
2,316 Posts
I personally would get a burly single crown AM or DJ fork with the same axle to crown measurement. You could go for a DH but just seems overkill to me, and going to be almost impossible to find a 100mm DH fork. If you don't care about the weight or dealing with a dual crown setup, no reason it wouldn't work, but you definitely want to match the fork size as close as possible or it can mess up the ride quality.

Have you had the fork serviced? You shouldn't be losing pressure on a ride but I guess that is an XC fork so may be out of its intended usage?
 

·
Registered
Joined
·
8 Posts
Discussion Starter #5
I personally would get a burly single crown AM or DJ fork with the same axle to crown measurement. You could go for a DH but just seems overkill to me, and going to be almost impossible to find a 100mm DH fork. If you don't care about the weight or dealing with a dual crown setup, no reason it wouldn't work, but you definitely want to match the fork size as close as possible or it can mess up the ride quality.

Have you had the fork serviced? You shouldn't be losing pressure on a ride but I guess that is an XC fork so may be out of its intended usage?
Yea the fork is serviced..
The dh fork is a rockshock boxxer rc 2011.
I believe it's a 200mm travel.
Ism not worried with weight...
Not losing pressure on rides or offroad only loose pressure when iam jumping every thing that I can jump.. then presure is lost.

Sent from my SM-N970F using tiny.cc/Mtbr_android_app
 

·
EDR
Joined
·
10,035 Posts
Pretty sure GT87 was being a little sarcastic, at least I hope so.

A 200mm fork on a xc race bike is not a good idea. But hey, if it looks cool.......
 

·
Sneaker man
Joined
·
3,379 Posts
OK, I'm just going to say it...this is a terrible idea. That bike is not meant to have 200mm fork up front. you could go to 120mm, but 200, way too much.
Specialised brain stuff is renowned for being good when it works, but last for about 5 minutes before needing a full rebuild/replacement.
 

·
Banned
Joined
·
976 Posts
OK, I'm just going to say it...this is a terrible idea. That bike is not meant to have 200mm fork up front. you could go to 120mm, but 200, way too much.
Specialised brain stuff is renowned for being good when it works, but last for about 5 minutes before needing a full rebuild/replacement.
What's terrible about it? Only drawbacks I see are that it'll be a little bit heavier, and will forgo the lockout, but OP is already aware of these compromises. On the plus side, it'll improve the geometry by slacking out the angles and raising the bb, it'll reinforce the headtube area so the frame will be way less likely to fail when casing gaps, and most importantly it'll look badass! 2010 epic with a boxxer is a proper downcountry bike.

Sent from my moto g(7) power using Tapatalk
 

·
Sneaker man
Joined
·
3,379 Posts
What's terrible about it? Only drawbacks I see are that it'll be a little bit heavier, and will forgo the lockout, but OP is already aware of these compromises. On the plus side, it'll improve the geometry by slacking out the angles and raising the bb, it'll reinforce the headtube area so the frame will be way less likely to fail when casing gaps, and most importantly it'll look badass! 2010 epic with a boxxer is a proper downcountry bike.

Sent from my moto g(7) power using Tapatalk
Really can't tell if your being serious or not?
Yeah it will weigh more, clearly, no lockout, not the end of the world, but it will be a soft squishy mess of travel.
It will raise up the BB, but also everything else at the front end and do super crazy things to the geo, not just "improve it" it go beyond into "sucktastic". The Sworks epic is a super light XC bike, you put a duel crown 200mm fork with the super slacker out front end, it won't reinforce the headtube, the extra leverage, it'll more than likely snap the headtube clean off.

If it was a beater bike to do silly stuff on, then id say maybe try it, but watch the front falling off and loosing all your teeth... but the OP said "We do mostly trails.. road and offroad not very much downhill", so a boxxer would be a terrible idea.
 

·
Banned
Joined
·
976 Posts
Really can't tell if your being serious or not?
Yeah it will weigh more, clearly, no lockout, not the end of the world, but it will be a soft squishy mess of travel.
It will raise up the BB, but also everything else at the front end and do super crazy things to the geo, not just "improve it" it go beyond into "sucktastic". The Sworks epic is a super light XC bike, you put a duel crown 200mm fork with the super slacker out front end, it won't reinforce the headtube, the extra leverage, it'll more than likely snap the headtube clean off.

If it was a beater bike to do silly stuff on, then id say maybe try it, but watch the front falling off and loosing all your teeth... but the OP said "We do mostly trails.. road and offroad not very much downhill", so a boxxer would be a terrible idea.
A serious question deserves a serious answer.

Please note that the OP mentions "jumping everything he can". Clearly he will benefit from massive upgrade in performance from the dual-crown fork.

Slacker headangle = more stability = better downhill performance.

Slacker seat-angle = more efficient pedaling position for seated pedaling while riding downhill on jump trails. Be sure to adjust the rear shocks rebound wide open and run your seatpost at full height for best results.

Higher bb = more ground clearance = obviously better for riding off-road and pedaling indiscrimately over obstacles.

Higher a2c = shorter reach = more flickable = more steaze when boosting big airs.

Dual crowns = twice as good as single-crown = 3x more badass looking = 4x more babes want your number at the trailhead. No more worries about the headtube shearing off... the dual-crown solves that problem by reinforcing the headtube area of the frame.

If you're worried about the fork raising the handlebars too much for efficient climbing, you could try running more sag and less compression damping... something in the neighborhood of 40-50% sag should be ideal = problem solved.

The 2010 epic was a good bike for it's time, but things have come a long way since. The boxxer upgrade will modernize the bike and turn it into a true downcountry ripper.

One other word of advice... I don't care how good the deal seems, I wouldn't even consider buying an old 26" boxxer unless the seller was a teenager that lives near a bike park.

Sent from my moto g(7) power using Tapatalk
 

·
Sneaker man
Joined
·
3,379 Posts
he actually said "Jumping everything I can jump", I took that to mean he would jump everything that he had the ability to jump, as in he liked jumping but wasnt about to jump anything big (big being relative). - he also said he didn't do much DH at all, more general trail and road riding.
And a 2010 epic was a good bike in its time, but would a 2011 boxxer really modernize it that much?

Thing is the OP could do it and it could be perfect for him and give years of pleasurable riding, but I'd think having twice as much travel as it is designed for, and being a pure XC bike, it will handle like poo and the extra leverage and stiffnes, instead of flexing in the fork/steerer, will snap the headtube off the 5th time he cases a jump.
 

·
Banned
Joined
·
976 Posts
he actually said "Jumping everything I can jump", I took that to mean he would jump everything that he had the ability to jump, as in he liked jumping but wasnt about to jump anything big (big being relative). - he also said he didn't do much DH at all, more general trail and road riding.
And a 2010 epic was a good bike in its time, but would a 2011 boxxer really modernize it that much?

Thing is the OP could do it and it could be perfect for him and give years of pleasurable riding, but I'd think having twice as much travel as it is designed for, and being a pure XC bike, it will handle like poo and the extra leverage and stiffnes, instead of flexing in the fork/steerer, will snap the headtube off the 5th time he cases a jump.
"And a 2010 epic was a good bike in its time, but would a 2011 boxxer really modernize it that much?"

The answer is yes, it will. Anyone who buys a modern bike is a sucker. The industry keeps pushing out new "innovations" to the masses, but really it's all marketing bs. Adding a dual-crown boxxer to a ten-year-old superlight 26" xc race bike will accomplish the exact same thing. I challenge anyone to tell the difference between that and the latest generation of progressive trail bikes in a blind test.

You keep talking about shearing off the headtube, but carbon is stronger than aluminum, and plenty of downhill bikes are made of aluminum and I don't see them shearing their headtubes off. So if an aluminum downhill bike can handle a boxxer, then surely a superlight carbon xc bike can handle one too. Case closed (no pun intended)

You say it will handle like poo. I say one mans poo is another mans downcountry berm blaster.

Sent from my moto g(7) power using Tapatalk
 

·
Sneaker man
Joined
·
3,379 Posts
you realise that an epic is a really light (for the time) XC bike...I'd think that any aluminium DH bike designed to take a 200mm fork is waaay stronger in the headtube than a carbon bike that is designed to be as light as possbile and take a 100mm fork.
That is not to say it will, but carbon is very good at doing things it is designed to do, but not so good at doing things it is not designed to do, but it is a possibilty-- well maybe not snap the headtube off, probably fail mid tube somewhere, but effectively the same.

also i'm not pointing the finger at carbon, i have carbon bikes (also steel, aluminium and titanium), I don't expect them to break, but know they can...and putting a 200mm triple clamp fork on any material pure XC bike is not a good idea. Will it break, well you won't know till you try it, but if it does, it will be catastophic to the frame and probably to the rider. Just an all round bad idea.
 

·
Banned
Joined
·
976 Posts
you realise that an epic is a really light (for the time) XC bike...I'd think that any aluminium DH bike designed to take a 200mm fork is waaay stronger in the headtube than a carbon bike that is designed to be as light as possbile and take a 100mm fork.
That is not to say it will, but carbon is very good at doing things it is designed to do, but not so good at doing things it is not designed to do, but it is a possibilty-- well maybe not snap the headtube off, probably fail mid tube somewhere, but effectively the same.

also i'm not pointing the finger at carbon, i have carbon bikes (also steel, aluminium and titanium), I don't expect them to break, but know they can...and putting a 200mm triple clamp fork on any material pure XC bike is not a good idea. Will it break, well you won't know till you try it, but if it does, it will be catastophic to the frame and probably to the rider. Just an all round bad idea.
This is nothing but hyperbole and speculation.

Just because it's a lightweight xc race bike doesn't mean you can't install a boxxer and send it. Don't believe the marketing hype.

Sent from my moto g(7) power using Tapatalk
 

·
Registered
Joined
·
5,127 Posts
I think increasing the front end height/travel a little is a fine idea. There's a point at which it might just be too much, but you (OP) know better than us exactly what you'll do with the final product. No way I'd do it, but if you hate it, you're just out some money.
 

·
Registered
Joined
·
8 Posts
Discussion Starter #16
Thanks guys making alot of sence* I believe there is truth between @mik_git and @GT87

I work with alot of material and where @mik_git ses could put extra strain on bike.. I believe it 100% to a point of breaking I dont know.

@GT87 100% on the marketing BS I believe it aswell.

I got a few options thanks for the clarification* will post what I have decided.
If I go dh I can always fabricate bottom pins so I can reduse travel to 100mm. Will drop the front end to standard.*

I got another two options to the dh forks it is the fox 32 or rockshock sid both or for the 27.5 inch tyre.. I dont see any problem with that..

Whould you guys say going my other options would be better than the dh fork?

Sent from my SM-N970F using tiny.cc/Mtbr_android_app
 

·
Banned
Joined
·
976 Posts
Thanks guys making alot of sence* I believe there is truth between @mik_git and @GT87

I work with alot of material and where @mik_git ses could put extra strain on bike.. I believe it 100% to a point of breaking I dont know.

@GT87 100% on the marketing BS I believe it aswell.

I got a few options thanks for the clarification* will post what I have decided.
If I go dh I can always fabricate bottom pins so I can reduse travel to 100mm. Will drop the front end to standard.*

I got another two options to the dh forks it is the fox 32 or rockshock sid both or for the 27.5 inch tyre.. I dont see any problem with that..

Whould you guys say going my other options would be better than the dh fork?

Sent from my SM-N970F using tiny.cc/Mtbr_android_app
Boxxer or sid... hmmm, tough call, maybe just flip a coin... can't go wrong either way.

Sent from my moto g(7) power using Tapatalk
 

·
Bikes in jeans
Joined
·
2,316 Posts
Boxxer or sid... hmmm, tough call, maybe just flip a coin... can't go wrong either way.

Sent from my moto g(7) power using Tapatalk
Boxer and SID are 2 sides of the same coin... ;)

Or is it boxer and rigid?
 

·
Bikes in jeans
Joined
·
2,316 Posts
At this point I literally think you should abandon this project and sell the bike and get a different setup that is more suitable for your riding style.
 
1 - 20 of 22 Posts
Top