CB is harder
Dirtrider71 said:
I recently raced in the Crested Butte Classic and will be competeing in the Leadville 100 next month. Has anybody done both in the past? Looking for a comparson between the two courses, physically and technically. Any advice for doing the Leadville will be helpful as well.
I just got back from the CB100. I dropped after two laps. I did the LT100 last year and will again next month.
My feeling when I walked away from the CB100 was that 2 laps of CB was about an equal effort to the full LT100. I was on the bike for a little over 8.5 hours, a little over 9.5 elapsed time. I GPS'd those two laps, and I also GPS'd Leadville which I finished in 11:15.
The first lap was about 31 miles, and 3,761 feet of climbing
The second was about 37 miles, and 4,831 feet of climbing
I don't have a track for the 3rd lap, but using topo I estimate that it was ~3,500 feet of climbing.
If I'm right, the CB100 course has roughly the same amount of climbing as Leadville, which I measured at 12,232 last year. But CB seemed like much harder work to me. The descents at Leadville are easy, but at CB they were work. Fun work, but tough on the shoulders, triceps and hands.
Also at Leadville, you have some climb/descent work, then a big flat. Then a big climb/descent, then a big flat. Then finish with climb/descent/climb/descent. I didn't really notice much at CB that I'd call flat--maybe the beginning of lap two for 6-8 miles.
I was in CB for fun and for a good training exercise. I got both, but I really burned it up. I think I went out too hard. I had the staggers at the end of lap 1. By the end of the 2nd I was cross-eyed. I'll be taking Leadville quite a bit more seriously.
I'm not exactly a vet, but my advice for Leadville is to use the flat on the way back from Twin Lakes to recover so that you have some of your cookies left for the powerline. And I'd say that if you finished the CB100 in less than 13 hours you're a cinch to finish Leadville in 12.