I now certify you "worthless chump of the the month"nhodge said:nomotivs,
you are a complete chump if you're concerned w/ wheelbases, especially Turners. just ask Dave, he'll tell ya. they don't show up on the geo. listings 'cause it ain't important. if you think they are, well , you're just not w/ it.
Very close to a TNT RFX w/ 36. I took my build off the 08 RFX and switched it to the 09 DW Spot, resulting in a bike that felt much more like the RFX than a 140 forked Spot. The 36 gave it a 67.5 HA at the 160 setting.DHRracer said:How does it compare both riding and geometry wise from a TNT 5.5 Spot with a Fox Float 140 and a TNT Pack with spot seat stays and 5.5 rockers with a 36?Any Idea?
With Kenda 2.35 tires F&R my bb sits at 13.6", about .5" lower than my RFX with the same tires and fork.FM said:Now that brings up a good question, what is the BB height for a DW-spot with a 160mm fox fork?
I have this new hardtail with a sub-13" BB and 150mm fork up front.... it's made even more of a BB height nazi out of me!
go to Page 15 on the date of 3-25-09 & read my thread entitled wheel bases w/ a blue Q.[email protected] said:Since when was wheelbase not important?????????????????????????????????????
Please tell me you're kidding.
wow, I asked a few months about the BB height on a Spot with a 36 TALAS and somebody measured it around 14.25" if my memory serves...which seemed really freakin high. 13.6 sounds much better!1soulrider said:With Kenda 2.35 tires F&R my bb sits at 13.6", about .5" lower than my RFX with the same tires and fork.
I saw a bb measurement of a '10 demo 8 that sat slightly below 13"...........