erm..i thought titanium has no fatigue life? or isit very long fatigue life? if so carbon can handle more fatigue or aluminum?damion said:Any material can fail from fatigue.
ic....so if generally Aluminum vs Carbon..which one has longer fatigue life?garboui said:materials like steel and ti are said to have an infinite fatigue life compared to al. steel and ti will just take many many many more cycles than al that for its intended use its almost infinite.
With all the above, Ti, Carbon, Al, Steel, Unobtainium - it depends on the design.mafia6 said:ic....so if generally Aluminum vs Carbon..which one has longer fatigue life?
If you mean mostly wrong then yeah......... they are great.mafia6 said:wow thx u guys are great..![]()
I'm not an engineer but isn't fatigue a failure that starts on the molekule level? Meaning that over time the properties of a material change?Hosehead said:If you mean mostly wrong then yeah......... they are great.
Fatigue is a failure method in which a small crack starts in a part from being repeatedly loaded at a stress level that is much less than the ultimate strength of a material. The crack propigates with each stress "cycle". Steel and titanium can have an unlimited fatigue life, but it depends on the individual design. Aluminum has a finite fatigue life, no matter the part, and no matter the load. Meaning if you repeatedly stress an aluminum part it will eventually break.
Carbon simply doesn't suffer from fatigue in the traditional sense, it has an unlimited fatigue life regardless of design.
Properties of some materials can change over time, but that is a completely different phenomenon from fatigue.carl1266 said:I'm not an engineer but isn't fatigue a failure that starts on the molekule level? Meaning that over time the properties of a material change?
steel, and I THINIK titanium have an infinite fatigue life. this is of course assuming that you keep the load under a certain amount.damion said:Any material can fail from fatigue.
The fatigue limit is simply when you have undergone enough load cycles at the proper load that you can then expect a fatigue crack. Everything does not have a fatigue limit. For example a carbon fiber part doesn't fatigue, so it can't have a fatigue limit.Jayem said:There's also something called the "fatigue limit". If this is exceeded you throw everything out the window and you are in uncharted territory as far as when or if the bike will fail. Everything has a fatigue limit, and there may not be any indicator to let you know that you've exceeded the limit.
i think fatigue has more to do with work hardening than an actual crack.Hosehead said:If you mean mostly wrong then yeah......... they are great.
Fatigue is a failure method in which a small crack starts in a part from being repeatedly loaded at a stress level that is much less than the ultimate strength of a material. The crack propigates with each stress "cycle". Steel and titanium can have an unlimited fatigue life, but it depends on the individual design. Aluminum has a finite fatigue life, no matter the part, and no matter the load. Meaning if you repeatedly stress an aluminum part it will eventually break.
Carbon simply doesn't suffer from fatigue in the traditional sense, it has an unlimited fatigue life regardless of design.
No, for those materials that do not have a fatigue limit, the limit is the maximum load they can bear before the integrity is compramised.Hosehead said:The fatigue limit is simply when you have undergone enough load cycles at the proper load that you can then expect a fatigue crack. Everything does not have a fatigue limit. For example a carbon fiber part doesn't fatigue, so it can't have a fatigue limit.
Right, single cycle fatigue failures are common.Jayem said:No, for those materials that do not have a fatigue limit, the limit is the maximum load they can bear before the integrity is compramised.
Depends on the load imposed.Hosehead said:Right, single cycle fatigue failures are common.![]()