Joined
·
309 Posts
I am 5' 10.5" with fairly typical proportions - perhaps my legs are a bit on the short side. Anyways, I recently rode a friend's bike on a recent vacation. It is a typical 5.5" AM bike with a 68 degree HA. It is a medium and has a 23.25" TT, 685mm bars and 90mm stem. I am looking to get the same bike.
The size of his bike feels really good to me, but I am definitely going to run a 65mm or 70mm stem and either 685 or 711mm bars. I will be using the bike for everything - XC, technical climbs and downhill stuff with 3 to 4' drops. I am not a racer, but like to ride everything as fast as I can and usually have to climb up to bomb down.
With my stem choice, I will be shortening the cockpit by about 1". My question is, should I move up to a large frame which has a 24.25" TT, which would effectively give me the same cockpit size? The standover on both sizes is fine for me. I am afraid that if I get the medium frame that I will feel cramped with my shorter stem.
FWIW, my friend lives out of town and I did not/will not have a chance to ride his bike again and be able to switch out stems.
The size of his bike feels really good to me, but I am definitely going to run a 65mm or 70mm stem and either 685 or 711mm bars. I will be using the bike for everything - XC, technical climbs and downhill stuff with 3 to 4' drops. I am not a racer, but like to ride everything as fast as I can and usually have to climb up to bomb down.
With my stem choice, I will be shortening the cockpit by about 1". My question is, should I move up to a large frame which has a 24.25" TT, which would effectively give me the same cockpit size? The standover on both sizes is fine for me. I am afraid that if I get the medium frame that I will feel cramped with my shorter stem.
FWIW, my friend lives out of town and I did not/will not have a chance to ride his bike again and be able to switch out stems.