I found some specs on the bike. It's the large frame. Thanks
Makes sense to me. Thank you so much.You're going to be cramped on the L unless you use a longer stem(which it has) than currently normal. Otherwise it's a good bike for the price. Look at the suspension bushings and dogbone mentioned in the vid. Your inseam makes your torso longer. That's why you'll be cramped. Longer torso needs more cockpit reach. You can be a XL on older geo bikes. New bike geo has moved to longer reach with less steep head tube angle. Wider bars 760-800mm would help you fit.
Disagree.You're going to be cramped on the L unless you use a longer stem(which it has) than currently normal. ....Your inseam makes your torso longer. That's why you'll be cramped. Longer torso needs more cockpit reach. You can be a XL on older geo bikes
I understand. Please let me know what other info I can provide to get the best answers. Thank you.Disagree.
I'm about the same dimensions as the OP, have owned and ridden many, many bikes over the bast 30+ years of MTBing and have never remotely considered an XL frame.
You can't determine things like 'you'll be cramped' based on the information given.
May or may not be. Aside from the crank wear, it looks like it could be in pretty good shape to me (from what I can see).The bike doesn’t looked to have been care for, the pivots might be creaking while riding or climbing under your weight. Check. This might or might not matter as you are a mechanic.
I feel 600 for a not so well maintained 2013 bike might be much. New at one point was 999, in the lowest model of course. Talk the seller to 450-500, again mainly concerned about the pivots. You will find that creaks and clicking sound drives you crazy. Having to regrease after every other ride is a major turn off.
Thanks for the info. Looks Iike it has 780mm bars on it. They feel great!If it has the 690mm bars you may like 760mm or wider risers bars as an upgrade.