Thanks. Great link!gdunha said:check this out: www.GearReview.com. I think that they look pretty interesting but have not tried them myself
G
How big of a guy are you? I'm pretty large myself and my concern is whether or not the straps will be large enough.elgordo said:i just got a Wingnut gear Hyper 3.0. I have not had a chance to test it extensively but i filled it up with water and some essentials for a short ride. feels really comfortable. as you probably know the pack sits on your lower back just above the hips. in the standing position its a little awkward but comfortable and natural while in the saddle. Also the Hyper line has mesh pockets on the sides easily accessed while ridding. go for it. nice packs and made in the USA if that matters to you
WTB-rider i'm 5'-10" @ 180lbs. my waist is a 34 and my chest is, hang on, a 41. my pack, the Hyper 3.0, fits me well and has ample strap length left. i dont have it with me now but i can measure strap length if you like. Also dont hesitate to call wingnut gear to inquire about fit. from what i hear they are good people and certainly have fit many pack to many people. good luck : )WTB-rider said:How big of a guy are you? I'm pretty large myself and my concern is whether or not the straps will be large enough.
Actually I am testing a 2.5 right now. It's about the same size as the 1.5, but with 95 oz bladder.namrita said:In addition to the reduced stress on my shoulders, I really like the wing pockets..you can access anything in the pockets while you're riding..I've used the Hyper 1.5 but I need the bladder to carry more water for longer rides (4hours+). My fiance is using the Hyper 3.0 and he loves it. I do plan on checking out the Adventure pack for Adventure Racing.
Absolutely! That is exactly what I am saying. I highly recommend you try one.teamdicky said:Are you saying that this is THE best one you have tried Eddie?
I don't even see a 2.5 on the site. It holds the same amount of gear as the 1.5? That doesn't seem like a lot of room. The 3.0 looks nice and spacious.Eddie O said:Absolutely! That is exactly what I am saying. I highly recommend you try one.
Eddie O
Does the main compartment have dividers?Eddie O said:Absolutely! That is exactly what I am saying. I highly recommend you try one.
Eddie O
The 2.5 is new and not in full production yet. The 3.0 has more storage, but only 5oz more bladder capacity. I'll find out when the 2.5 is going to be available.teamdicky said:I don't even see a 2.5 on the site. It holds the same amount of gear as the 1.5? That doesn't seem like a lot of room. The 3.0 looks nice and spacious.
Update that blog man. I know how you did in GA. How 'bout some news? I don't have a blog of my own to take up my free time so I live vicariously through all the endurance blogs I can find.
The main compartment opens up big, but does not have dividers.teamdicky said:Does the main compartment have dividers?
Does the main compartment open up really big (clamshell style)?
Can you use a Camlebak 100 oz bladder w/o a problem?
Is the waist belt wide, say 2" or so?
Does it have a Sirius radio option?
Are you able to access your jersey pockets still? Are your jersey pockets pointless when you have the easy access compartments on the side? I usually try to keep GU's and Endurolytes pretty handy.
The main/big compartment is not divided. This leaves a lot of room for clothing, lights, large tools (shock pump, though I know you don't carry one), etc... There is a mesh and waterproof pocket on each side that is accessible while riding. In these side pockets is where I carry bars, gels, multi-tool, mini pump, tubes, chain lube, camera, etc.teamdicky said:Does the main compartment have dividers?
No but that's not a bad idea and I'll pass it along to the designer. Both the 1.5 & 2.5 has a large opening at the top of a deep compartment. There is plenty of room to root through it to find stuff, but a full clamshell style opening would be nice. They also have an elastic pull string deal to hold stuff on the outside of the pack.Does the main compartment open up really big (clamshell style)?
I've been using a 70oz Camlebak in the 1.5. I can only put 50oz in it though. The 2.5 have it's own bladder specifically designed to fit into the space provided in the pack. It's closer to a square shape vs the Camlebak's elongated rectangle.Can you use a Camlebak 100 oz bladder w/o a problem?
Yes and it does a nice job of pulling the "wings" in tight to your hips. This is important for a skinny guy such as yourself.Is the waist belt wide, say 2" or so?
They don't offer a factory installation, but I'm sure you could work it in.Does it have a Sirius radio option?
You can still keep GUs, Endurolytes, a pill case, bars in the two outer pockets and the pack will sit over them without an issue. The center pocket is pretty much inaccessible. These has only been an issue for my helmet light batteries, which I like to keep there. I instead put the battery in the larger center compartment in the pack. Both the 1.5 & 2.5 and I assume the 3.0 have a mesh pocket on one of the front straps to hold a gel flask or an iPOD shuffle as well.Are you able to access your jersey pockets still? Are your jersey pockets pointless when you have the easy access compartments on the side? I usually try to keep GU's and Endurolytes pretty handy.
I would love to see more designers use a clamshell. When time is important it is a huge pain to empty a deep compartment to access something at the bottom. Then you spend then next five minutes putting everything back in and looking all over the ground to make sure you got all your stuff. It always seems that no matter what I only need whatever is at the bottom. My Blowfish has to be semi-unloaded to fit the bladder back in at max capacity, also slowing down transition times. I am sweating these small details as my next possible big race adds points for every second behind the leader (points are bad).Eddie O said:I do not have a 3.0...yet, so my answers are for the 1.5 & 2.5 only.
The main/big compartment is not divided. This leaves a lot of room for clothing, lights, large tools (shock pump, though I know you don't carry one), etc... There is a mesh and waterproof pocket on each side that is accessible while riding. In these side pockets is where I carry bars, gels, multi-tool, mini pump, tubes, chain lube, camera, etc.
No but that's not a bad idea and I'll pass it along to the designer. Both the 1.5 & 2.5 has a large opening at the top of a deep compartment. There is plenty of room to root through it to find stuff, but a full clamshell style opening would be nice. They also have an elastic pull string deal to hold stuff on the outside of the pack.
I've been using a 70oz Camlebak in the 1.5. I can only put 50oz in it though. The 2.5 have it's own bladder specifically designed to fit into the space provided in the pack. It's closer to a square shape vs the Camlebak's elongated rectangle.
Yes and it does a nice job of pulling the "wings" in tight to your hips. This is important for a skinny guy such as yourself.
They don't offer a factory installation, but I'm sure you could work it in.
You can still keep GUs, Endurolytes, a pill case, bars in the two outer pockets and the pack will sit over them without an issue. The center pocket is pretty much inaccessible. These has only been an issue for my helmet light batteries, which I like to keep there. I instead put the battery in the larger center compartment in the pack. Both the 1.5 & 2.5 and I assume the 3.0 have a mesh pocket on one of the front straps to hold a gel flask or an iPOD shuffle as well.
...and don't forget the whistle built into the front chest buckle. It's great for calling for help or screwing with dogs.
Eddie O
Hate to get all anal, but could there be a few feature close-ups? I am wondering if I want to hold off until the 2.5 would be made available. Otherwise I may just go with the 3.0.Eddie O said:I'll get some ASAP.....like today.
Eddie O