Mountain Bike Reviews Forum banner
1 - 20 of 49 Posts

·
Registered
Joined
·
1,619 Posts
Discussion Starter · #1 ·
I know this is really a question know one can answer since I'm looking at DWL bikes and nobody's ridden an RFX, but anyways...

Based on experience with the non-DW bikes, which one is going to climb the chunky stuff better, the big wheeled bike or the one with more travel?

I own a 29er and a few 26" bikes and while I do like the 29er a lot, I'm not married to the concept and a 160mm bike with 2.5 tires will be yet another experience to have.

Technical climbing is what I'm all about. I like to ride up things that nobody else can. It makes me smile the most.

Whatcha think?
 

·
Registered
Joined
·
7,022 Posts
I have ridden a sultan for 2.5 years & owned an RFX (up until a couple months ago) for over 5 years. The Sultan is easily the better climber in any regard...chunk in particular. I only have a couple weeks on the DW-Sultan, but it is easily the superior climber, in every way, over the other 2.
 

·
Registered
Joined
·
1,644 Posts
Tscheezy Question

tscheezy said:
I had a 6-Pack from late 2004 to early 2008 and have had an RFX since then, and I have also owned a Sultan for almost 2 years. My experience has been exactly the opposite of what JNC outlined.
Sorry to de-rail here.

Tscheezy,
How do you like your new RFX?
How does it compare to the old 6Pack/RFX?
Any pics of the setup?

Thanks,
TG
 

·
Registered
Joined
·
8,143 Posts
jncarpenter said:
The Sultan is easily the better climber in any regard...chunk in particular.
Correct.

Also, on any long, chunky ride, I would finish with less leg fatigue on the Sultan than on the RFX.

But on the really chunky downhill stuff, the Sultan is not quite as uber-smooth as the RFX was, when I had it set up with a CCDB and 36 Van RC.
 

·
Keep on Rockin...
Joined
·
6,473 Posts
29er for sure....

juan_speeder said:
I know this is really a question know one can answer since I'm looking at DWL bikes and nobody's ridden an RFX, but anyways...

Based on experience with the non-DW bikes, which one is going to climb the chunky stuff better, the big wheeled bike or the one with more travel?

I own a 29er and a few 26" bikes and while I do like the 29er a lot, I'm not married to the concept and a 160mm bike with 2.5 tires will be yet another experience to have.

Technical climbing is what I'm all about. I like to ride up things that nobody else can. It makes me smile the most.

Whatcha think?
Trying to clean tough, technical climbs is my thing as well.

I have neither a Sultan or an RFX but have a FS 29er and have had multiple long travel 26" bikes.

Lower speed maneuvering through rough stuff is where 29ers really shine. The big wheels simply don't get hung up on big rocks like a 26" wheel (that's why 24" rear wheels fell out of favor on DH rigs). To further tilt the scale in favor of the big wheels, longer travel bikes wallow in slow speed, big rock territory.

Traction is far better on a 29" wheel.

Hobby-horse. Longer travel bikes "hobby-horse" on steep climbs. The rear end sinks way low and the fork fully extends. You end up with the worst possible effective climbing geometry. Most will agree you can get "feel" of more travel out of a 29" wheel without having that extra travel. So you get the benefits of the travel without the hobby-horse drawback on climbs.

Acceleration. Maybe the 26" bike wins on a smooth surface, but trying to accelerate over chunk is a different story. I'd say thats a wash. Fortunately, you need relatively less speed to roll over chunk with the big wheel compared to a little wheel. Furthermore, long travel almost "requires" a good head of steam when navigating chunk, because, like I said before if you just plod along, you'll get bogged down in the travel.

None of this is to argue that a 29er is better, just that it's better in this particular arena.
 

·
Elitest thrill junkie
Joined
·
40,393 Posts
Rode the sultan, ride an RFX.

The sultan felt like a big XC machine, not goofy-big where I couldn't control it, but it had more XC traits, head angle, and feel. It rocked on technical XC trails, but it wasn't nearly as good for descending down the same trails when only the downhill direction was considered (such as a steep chute or technical obstacle). No doubt the 29er wheels can roll over some serious stuff, but the rest of the bike did not inspire confidence down sedona's steep chutes, whereas the spot seemed a better machine for the same.

Both the RFX and the Sultan will claw up nasty loose climbs, the sultan maintains better momentum on climbs, so while maintaining traction it can easily "outclimb" the RFX, plus it is usually a lighter bike, but once again when the trail turns predominantly down I'd rather be on the spot or RFX. They can be whipped back and forth so much easier and are just a hoot to ride. The sultan is no slouch, but just not the same game. For some bigger/taller riders a sultan may be a better fit, but if you really want to look at something that may be similer to the RFX/Spot look at the Lenz 5 or 6" travel bike with a big enough fork to give a nice slack head angle.
 

·
whoa!
Joined
·
1,277 Posts
Jayem said:
Rode the sultan, ride an RFX.

The sultan felt like a big XC machine, not goofy-big where I couldn't control it, but it had more XC traits, head angle, and feel. It rocked on technical XC trails, but it wasn't nearly as good for descending down the same trails when only the downhill direction was considered (such as a steep chute or technical obstacle). No doubt the 29er wheels can roll over some serious stuff, but the rest of the bike did not inspire confidence down sedona's steep chutes, whereas the spot seemed a better machine for the same.

Both the RFX and the Sultan will claw up nasty loose climbs, the sultan maintains better momentum on climbs, so while maintaining traction it can easily "outclimb" the RFX, plus it is usually a lighter bike, but once again when the trail turns predominantly down I'd rather be on the spot or RFX. They can be whipped back and forth so much easier and are just a hoot to ride. The sultan is no slouch, but just not the same game. For some bigger/taller riders a sultan may be a better fit, but if you really want to look at something that may be similer to the RFX/Spot look at the Lenz 5 or 6" travel bike with a big enough fork to give a nice slack head angle.
Good comparison Jay. . . Was that a V1 or Dw Sultan, did it have a 20mm front axle, etc?
 

·
Banned
Joined
·
8,202 Posts
We've got at least one large RFX in the Bando stable that you could get some saddle time. I happen to know a friend the knows a cousin....etc;)

We're headed out to Red Mesa on Saturday so I could put in a good word for you with Jose. There is some serious technical climbing out there. Similar to some of your favs...doc long and the like, but maybe a tad looser:eek:
 

·
Powered by ice cream.
Joined
·
6,359 Posts
juan_speeder said:
Technical climbing is what I'm all about. I like to ride up things that nobody else can. It makes me smile the most.
No experience on long travel 26" bikes, but comparing 4 and 5 inch travel 26 vs 29 inch bikes, my experience mirrors JNC and Miker J. Chunky technical climbing is one particular area where the 29" platform simply excels. Also, given the DW Sultan's geometry, suspension and travel I imagine it is a stand out amongst 29ers in this regard.

We are splitting hairs though, it is still mostly rider either way.

I would figure out what you are going to do the rest of the time on the bike and base your buying decision on that. If it is your passion, you will get that sucker to climb.

Edit: Consider the upcoming Niner WFO as well. 140mm of travel trumps the Sultan, mini link suspension should be near DW in performance if their RIP 9 is any indication. Could be a good one bike. You will have lots of choices to consider if you wait a year or so.
I personally ride a Lenz 6" 29"er which I think is a brilliant tech climber.
 

·
Registered
Joined
·
255 Posts
I remember Mo back at the 06' THC commenting the 29r was not as comforting on the downhill as his other 26" bikes. Uphill was great, rolling was great, but drops or anything requiring commitment bummed him a little. he seemed caged in a way...
 

·
Registered
Joined
·
1,619 Posts
Discussion Starter · #14 ·
Mtn. Biker123 said:
We've got at least one large RFX in the Bando stable that you could get some saddle time. I happen to know a friend the knows a cousin....etc;)

We're headed out to Red Mesa on Saturday so I could put in a good word for you with Jose. There is some serious technical climbing out there. Similar to some of your favs...doc long and the like, but maybe a tad looser:eek:
Thanks for the invite Bryan, but the family and I are doin' stuff up in Santa Fe on Saturday (ever eat at Bobcat Bites? Best burgers in the world.).

Honestly, because this is such a big $$$ decision, I'll probably order demo bikes from Competitive Cyclist, whenever the DW RFX becomes available, so I can make a well informed decision, because what works for me often isn't what works for the majority (Tscheesy being the outlier).

I just wanted to put some feelers out.
 

·
Banned
Joined
·
8,202 Posts
Wouldn't it be cool if Bikeworks got a DW demo. Seems someone stirred the pot a while back:p

Seriously, you are in a league of your own when it comes to mashing up some crazy climbs. I have ridden some 29'er hardtails and I am not exactly a slouch. I think they are equally matched when it comes to a rider who has the strength to carry a 35lb rig up a hill (which you should have no problem). The big difference is descending and I always figured you had a hidden talent there...just needed more bike:thumbsup: . In any case, whatever you decide, there is not much that will hold you back.

What happened to the Flux?
 

·
Elitest thrill junkie
Joined
·
40,393 Posts
Shin Music said:
Good comparison Jay. . . Was that a V1 or Dw Sultan, did it have a 20mm front axle, etc?
DW, can't remember if it was standard QR or 15mm.
 

·
Registered
Joined
·
3,090 Posts
After riding a Sultan for the past 2+ years and a RFX for almost a year I'd give the edge to the Sultan, but with a few caveats:

-I don't know if it's just the inherently larger gearing of the big wheels or what, but it seems much easier to modulate the torque you're laying down on a 29"er. I tend to think it's more than just the gearing, because I notice it even if using a proportionally smaller gear on the 29"er (e.g. a 22x32 on the Sultan vs. a 22x28 on the RFX). If I use a big enough gear (i.e. stay in the middle ring) on the RFX I don't notice it, but then on extended steep climbs I wear myself out too quickly.

-I think the Sultan does better on really loose stuff (elongated shape of contact patch probably comes into play here), while the RFX might have the edge on wet, slippery rocks/roots (where low pressure tires that can wrap themselves around the obstacles are crucial). In any discussion of technical climbing tire selection cannot be ignored, and the RFX certainly has the advantage there. You just don't have the option of putting DH casing UST tires on a Sultan and running them at 20 psi, should you be so inclined. :(

-The '08 RFX with an Avalanche Chubbie provides a ridiculous amount of rear traction, and the very stiff rear end helps you take advantage of it. Except for the phenomena mentioned above, it brings the RFX as close to a 29"er for technical climbing as any 26" bike I've ridden.

-I haven't ridden a DW Sultan (as of today ;)) But then again, no one has ridden a DW RFX. :eek:

In summation, technical climbing has always been my favorite trait of 29"ers, but the performance of the RFX has just about made this a draw for me. If you can only have one then you're probably better off comparing other aspects, like overall bike weight (do you want a bike that weighs in the upper 20's or low to mid 30 pound range?), how much strength/travel do you really need, etc.
 

·
Banned
Joined
·
8,202 Posts
juan_speeder said:
I broke it at the lower shock mount,
My point exactly! Go with the bigger bike. Besides you may be the first to pull the trigger (around these parts) on the D-dub RFX when released. But what to do until then? Maybe pick up a used RFX in the meantime and do a trade in when they new ones start rolling out. I am seeing them as low as $800.:thumbsup:
 

·
Daniel the Dog
Joined
·
6,764 Posts
Personal choice

The RFX is going to have a lot more travel and able to handle tight, technical terrain a lot better; however, the Sultan is going to float over some rocks and stuff that would create problems for the RFX. Go ride a 29er. The RFX will climb better because the wheels smaller and lighter. I like 29ers because I find them comfy but still own a Spot that I like very much....

Jaybo
 
1 - 20 of 49 Posts
This is an older thread, you may not receive a response, and could be reviving an old thread. Please consider creating a new thread.
Top