Joined
·
1,056 Posts
Just wanted some feedback on the bike - saw one today ; it looked like a Stache and not a Farley ...
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk Pro
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk Pro
I rode a few of the carbon models, a 70 and a 90. I liked the Q width and the fact it was a 177 bike. It felt very "XC" biased, fairly stable and planted. I like lively bikes with short chain stays, so i did not buy one for myself.Just wanted some feedback on the bike - saw one today ; it looked like a Stache and not a Farley ...
Good stuff - so you liked the bike just not the shape of one ...I rode a few of the carbon models, a 70 and a 90. I liked the Q width and the fact it was a 177 bike. It felt very "XC" biased, fairly stable and planted. I like lively bikes with short chain stays, so i did not buy one for myself.
There was a local RM dealer that had a -70 i ALMOST pulled the trigger on. They had the bike discounted 35%, but i noticed they used those metal bike stands that go between the rear frame and hub. When i looked under the frame, the triangle was all chipped up/damaged from the stand, so i passed...
sorta. i like lively bikes with short chainstays, the suzi was NOT my cup of tea. for the deal that could have been had, i would have added it to the stable for the "XC" type ride days. guess it was not meant to be.Good stuff - so you liked the bike just not the shape of one ...