As far as "Clydeability" goes....
mrgorth said:
I may be building a bike and am wondering which to put on. Similarly, Race Face cranks vs. XT? Thanks.
I would recommend Thomson seat post and stem. They are spendy, but at 6'5" and 225 lbs I have never bent or broken a Thomson seat post. I have bent alu Easton posts before and was not particularly impressed with the RF post seat clamp design. Not to mention that if you do break or bend a Thomson post they will replace it! But I've never had to avail myself of that option, they just don't bend or break, at least not under riding conditions. I've seen a couple that were bent in crashes, but the guys that were riding the post when it happened didn't walk away, they were carried out, and were in much worse shape than the seat post.
As for the Thomson stem it is by far the strongest, stiffest stem I've ever used as far as conventional stems go. One of my riding buds has had one for 4 years and it's still going strong. The one Easton stem that I had was quite stiff vertically, but flexed a bit lateraly (side to side). Not much, but I could feel it during hard high speed turns. A little disoncerting if you are sensative to such things. If not you might not even notice. But the quality and strength, plus Thomson being willing to back up their product is hard to beat.
For Cranks, either Shimano or Race Face will do. I've used both for years and they are both good performers. My personal preference leans toward Race Face. They are a bit stiffer than Shimano and in my experience the chain rings last longer. But a good set of Shimano XT or LX cranks are a good bet as well. And it you want a little extra oommph you can always go with the Saint or Hone crank set. Either way you won't go wrong with either set up.
Just my opinionated 2 cents.
Good Dirt