The Rockhopper and F5 are quite evenly spec'd, it would just come down to a matter of better fit. The F4 is obviously spec'd better, and if it fits you, should be seriously considered. We are talking about a new "leftover" 09 F4, right?
Its way more than the frame on the F4. Better shock, 9spd, and much better brakes.IslandStyle70 said:Yes, a leftover on closeout (out of state), so unfortunately I would be buying sight unseen. I've seen highly-regarded posts about the USA-made caffeine frame, so it caught my eye. Not sure it would make a difference to me, unless it's a "game-changer". The price increase is ~170USD.
Thanks for point out the other advantages that I missed during my first comp/spec comparison. Agreed on the brakes and 9spd. I've read enough on MTBR that there's not alot of good feedback on Dart3's, but I haven't seen any feedback on the Headshok Super Fatty (good/bad?). Any issues with it only being 80mm?JPark said:Its way more than the frame on the F4. Better shock, 9spd, and much better brakes.
But, as Jim said, fit is most inportant. If you can't try this one, then can you try another model C'dale in your size to determind fit?
Jim, thanks for the side by side comparison....cool tool and thanks for the heads up on the spring. I will ask/check, for sure.JimC. said:...I'd look to the F4 first. make sure the LBS has the right springs etc for the Headshok so your weight can be accommodated. I stress the headshok may not have that flexibility, but ask anyhow.
As I said above, if he can try out other C'dales to dial in fit, the risk is extremely limited, and very much worth it IMO.roc865 said:if you can't see and test ride the f4, i wouldn't even consider it.
go with the one that feels best to you.
this is true. even if it's not the perfect fit most of us end up tweaking as we go along anyway.JPark said:As I said above, if he can try out other C'dales to dial in fit, the risk is extremely limited, and very much worth it IMO.