Joined
·
1,243 Posts
Actually, I was curious what the women did, as not all women frequent all assorted threads.Call_me_Clyde said:But only because you have your answer, yet come to the women's lounge to get the same answer. The answer is this-bicycle specific shorts are made to be worn without underwear.
So it's irrelevant.brianthebiker said:Actually, I was curious what the women did, as not all women frequent all assorted threads.
Uh no, actually, I asked a simple question, as I wanted to see what the other half does.Call_me_Clyde said:You stared down both barrels of the gun and said "shoot me".
Curiosity I guess, as the article I read was not gender specific.*rt* said:what difference does it make?
what difference does it make?brianthebiker said:...I wanted to see what the other half does.
You asked a simple question. "Am I a dufus?" In my book, that's looking down both barrels and asking to be shot. But let's just put that aside for now. Your question about wearing underwear under bike specific shorts is legitimate. You got your answer, and believe it or not, it's not gender specific. Both men's and women's biking shorts are made to be worn sans skivvies.brianthebiker said:Uh no, actually, I asked a simple question, as I wanted to see what the other half does.
I am fully cognizant that i am a dufus in general. I was just curious whether I was a dufus regarding skivvies and biking shorts, and the answer also appears to be yes.Call_me_Clyde said:You asked a simple question. "Am I a dufus?" In my book, that's looking down both barrels and asking to be shot. But let's just put that aside for now. Your question about wearing underwear under bike specific shorts is legitimate. You got your answer, and believe it or not, it's not gender specific. Both men's and women's biking shorts are made to be worn sans skivvies.
With that said, let's see how "the other half" (as you call it) replies to your post. I'm certain that my sarcastic remarks will pale in comparison.
Ladies.....he's all yours.
Heh.brianthebiker said:I am fully cognizant that i am a dufus in general. I was just curious whether I was a dufus regarding skivvies and biking shorts, and the answer also appears to be yes.
AHHHHHH that's beautiful...good stuff. And no, you dont need the underness to go with the bike shorts...they end up in bad places...ouch Konacatzilla said:Heh.
Free the boys Brian! Free the boys!!!
Wear spandex with no whities. Where white swim trunks into the ocean. Get a man thong.
I guar-an-tee you that you are more concerned by that thin layer of fabric seperating you from the world than everyone else is.
Free the boys! Next thing you know, you'll be collecting shells on the beach in a speedo revelling in your new found freedom.
What she said.... lycra in contact with the skin is sexy. Most biking shorts (unless they're fugly made) are hypercomfy with noble parts of the manhood... nothing like the touch of lycra on... well, you get the idea.catzilla said:Free the boys! Next thing you know, you'll be collecting shells on the beach in a speedo revelling in your new found freedom.
it seems to be this week's trend. So what if your OP in some other forum got 37 replies, go ask in the WL. I can't see that it's worth it.Warp2003 said:And yes, you're a complete dufus for asking twice. It's like asking if the Beetle was made by VW to several different people and then go somewhere else to ask if the Beetle was made by VW to some other bunch. You're either making a fool of yourself or trying to make a fool of people.
.
Actually, it's against the rules of the forums... etiqette says you should write something like "X-Post" on the title, but it's still against the rules. And in this case, worthless.formica said:it seems to be this week's trend. So what if your OP in some other forum got 37 replies, go ask in the WL. I can't see that it's worth it.
~f.